[bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4

[Ron Andruff]

Phil,

 

In the interest of the short time frame to submissions, can I ask you to
send to the list your proposed language changes regarding the section you
disagree with?

 

Thanks,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

  _____  

From: Phil Corwin [mailto:pcorwin at butera-andrews.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:09 PM
To: Ron Andruff; bc-GNSO at icann.org
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4

 

Once again the ICA must dissent in regard to that portion of the proposed
comment dealing with the URS. Without getting into great detail - other than
noting that the domain transfer option, which was not even suggested by the
IRT, would further blur the distinction between URS and UDRP - we would
observe that to a large extent the details of the URS now in DAGv4 are based
largely on an STI process in which the BC participated, and which reached
consensus positions that were unanimously adopted by the GNSO and
subsequently accepted by the ICANN Board. 

 

That does not mean we are insensitive to the desire of rights holders to
have a faster and less expensive process for the 70% of UDRP filings that
result in a default judgment. However, our position remains that such
objective can be best achieved through balanced and comprehensive UDRP
reform that addresses the current UDRP concerns of both rights holders and
registrants, that places UDRP providers under binding and enforceable
agreements, and that applies to both incumbent and new gTLDs (which is the
only path to having a UDRP that is truly Uniform).

 

We do believe that any BC comment proposed to be submitted, given the
passage of time and events since BC positions were originally set, should be
subject to a vote of the Constituency membership. 

 

Thank you for considering our views.

 

Philip S. Corwin 
Partner 
Butera & Andrews 
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 
Suite 500 
Washington, DC 20004

202-347-6875 (office) 

202-347-6876 (fax)

202-255-6172 (cell)

"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey

  _____  

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Ron Andruff
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:21 AM
To: bc-GNSO at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4
Importance: High

 

Dear Members,

 

Further to my reminder earlier this week regarding the need for a BC public
comment on DAGv4, Sarah Deutsch and I have developed a draft for member
review and comment.  Effectively, we have taken the BC's DAGv3 comments and
added/amended based on (1) staff having largely ignored our comments in
DAGv2 and v3; and (2) utilized subsequent information that has come
available in the interim (e.g., the latest economic study). FYI, Sarah
drafted the RPM material and I took responsibility for the other elements.

 

We ask that members review and comment on the document at your earliest
convenience, so that we can meet the submission deadline of Wednesday, July
21st.  Sorry for the late posting, but unfortunately with summer holidays
and all, a few things are slipping between the cracks...

 

Thanks in advance for your soonest input.  

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20100715/efdeec49/attachment.html>