[bc-gnso] Last Call: BC Position on New TLD Registry Agreement Amendments DAG v3
philip.sheppard at aim.be
Wed Mar 31 07:27:33 UTC 2010
AIM supports this.
It may be helpful - in keeping with past BC papers - to separate by subtitles -
the factual background information and the BC position.
Your text already does this. Just a question of a couple of sub-titles I
believe. BC opinion starts at the paragraph "Therefore ICANN shouldn't..."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso