[bc-gnso] Last Call: BC Position on New TLD Registry Agreement Amendments DAG v3

[Philip Sheppard]

Steve,
AIM supports this.
 
It may be helpful - in keeping with past BC papers - to separate by subtitles -
the factual background information and the BC position.
Your text already does this. Just a question of a couple of sub-titles I
believe. BC opinion starts at the paragraph "Therefore ICANN shouldn't..."
 
Philip
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20100331/5a1bcd50/attachment.html>