[bc-gnso] Re: VERTICAL INTEGRATION WG Update
sdelbianco at netchoice.org
Mon May 3 01:58:21 UTC 2010
Berry Thanks. Will the BC soon be asked to evaluate the 9 VI models
presented thus far?
Proposals are listed at:
Do you and the BC team on the VI working group have any favorites among
those, or are we sitting on status quo?
If no favorites, are there elements of any of these plans that the BC should
On 4/30/10 9:40 AM, "berrycobb at infinityportals.com"
<berrycobb at infinityportals.com> wrote:
> My bad,
> I should have included a link to the 08/2009 position statement. I
> had a hard time finding it until it was pointed out to me right in
> front of me.
> One other correction.....the position statement is from August 2009,
> not November as I stated below.
> Berry Cobb
> Infinity Portals LLC
> berrycobb at infinityportals.com
> Quoting berrycobb at infinityportals.com:
>> As I mentioned in the status provided below, the Initial Comment Period
>> for Vertical Integration closes May 6th. Does anyone object to
>> submitting the CBUC Position Statement created Nov 2009 as our position
>> statement for this current VI period? I suspect that we will require a
>> consensus exercise as the WG completes its efforts in mid-May.
>> If I do not hear of any objections, I will advise Steve to repost on May 5th.
>> Thank you.
>> Berry Cobb
>> Infinity Portals LLC
>> berrycobb at infinityportals.com
>> Quoting berrycobb at infinityportals.com:
>>> Attached is a status report for the VI WG. I invite those members who
>>> also participate on the WG to add or comment on this summary, as I may
>>> have missed a thing or two.
>>> Kudos out to Mikey O'Conner who has taken the role of co-chair and
>>> moving the WG forward.
>>> Please advise if you have questions. Thank you.
>>> Berry Cobb
>>> Infinity Portals LLC
>>> berrycobb at infinityportals.com
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso