[bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes
Ron Andruff
randruff at rnapartners.com
Thu Nov 11 15:30:32 UTC 2010
>From a BC perspective, Philip is correct that we lost the debate. The
concerns about registrars having access to registry data and the harms that
can arise around such issues do need to be addressed, in my view. Therefore
I support Philip's suggestion that the BC submit a recommendation to make
the safeguards explicit. There is also work that still needs to be done on
policy around SRSU/SRMU, if my understanding of the Board's VI resolution is
correct.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
President
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
_____
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:05 AM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes
Re Board resolution
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-05nov10-en.htm
It seems we have lost the debate.
Are the Board safeguards sufficient?
Should we work on a paper to make them explicit?
Philip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20101111/d09d748b/attachment.html>
More information about the Bc-gnso
mailing list