[bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes

Ron Andruff randruff at rnapartners.com
Thu Nov 11 15:30:32 UTC 2010


>From a BC perspective, Philip is correct that we lost the debate.  The
concerns about registrars having access to registry data and the harms that
can arise around such issues do need to be addressed, in my view.  Therefore
I support Philip's suggestion that the BC submit a recommendation to make
the safeguards explicit.  There is also work that still needs to be done on
policy around SRSU/SRMU, if my understanding of the Board's VI resolution is
correct.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

  _____  

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:05 AM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes

 

Re Board resolution

http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-05nov10-en.htm

 

It seems we have lost the debate.

Are the Board safeguards sufficient?

Should we work on a paper to make them explicit?

Philip

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20101111/d09d748b/attachment.html>


More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list