[bc-gnso] RE: Revised Draft #3 of UDRP Provider Standard Mechanisms Position Paper

[Michael D. Palage]

Phil,

 

Thanks for the constructive edits. I also support Sarah's comments.

 

Best regards,

 

Michael

 

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Deutsch, Sarah B
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:08 PM
To: 'Phil Corwin'; bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: Revised Draft #3 of UDRP Provider Standard Mechanisms
Position Paper

 

Phil,


These changes address the concern -- thanks.  I deleted one addtional
sentence (attached) dealing with sanctions, which when changed to the
"mechanism" point didn't really mean anything.  Since we are steering away
from ordering sanctions, I think it's best to delete it.


Sarah

 



Sarah B. Deutsch 
Vice President & Associate General Counsel 
Verizon Communications 
Phone: 703-351-3044 
Fax: 703-351-3670 

 

 

  _____  

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Phil Corwin
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 5:07 PM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] Revised Draft #3 of UDRP Provider Standard Mechanisms
Position Paper
Importance: High

Attached is a 3rd draft of the BC position paper, in both redline and clean
form.

 

This draft incorporates recent input from Sarah, Philip, and others. It
excises all reference to "contract" or "sanctions" in the UDRP context. The
basic message is that no new UDRP providers should be accredited until ICANN
establishes a "standard mechanism" for their oversight that includes
"flexible and effective means of enforcement". It leaves the details of what
that mechanism and means should be to future consideration.

 

The current draft reflects suggested textual changes and comments from more
than half a dozen members of the BC. As the internal comment process has now
lasted almost one week, and as the comment filing date is one week from
tomorrow, I would suggest that we leave the current draft open for further
comments until the end of tomorrow (other than formatting and other
typographical alterations) and then lock it down and use the appropriate
process to assure that there is a consensus within the BC for filing it. I
defer to Marilyn, Steve and others on the approval procedure.

 

Thanks again to all who have provided input on this matter.

 

Best to all,

Philip

 

 

 

Philip S. Corwin 
Partner 
Butera & Andrews 
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 
Suite 500 
Washington, DC 20004

202-347-6875 (office) 

202-347-6876 (fax)

202-255-6172 (cell)

"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20101020/63953a33/attachment.html>