[bc-gnso] RAA contract participation

[Frederick Felman]

What's the logic behind the registrars position?  It doesn't seem to be represented in her article.  So, while I understand her POV because it's well developed, I don't understand why the registrars are intransigent on this subject.

Sent from +1(415)606-3733

On Apr 8, 2011, at 12:57 AM, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard at aim.be> wrote:

> 
> 
> I support the BC supporting the NCSG on this issue.
> 
> Philip
> ----------
> i all,
> 
> i think Avri's on to something here.  i agree with the points she's making.
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/registrar_stakeholder_group_gnso_works_against_ica
> nn_multistakeholder/
> 
> i haven't been tracking our positions on these motions -- i'm hoping that we're
> supporting the conclusions of the WG and resisting the inclination of the
> Council to rewrite the WG's conclusions.
> 
> mikey

Sent from +1(415)606-3733

On Apr 8, 2011, at 12:57 AM, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard at aim.be> wrote:

> 
> 
> I support the BC supporting the NCSG on this issue.
> 
> Philip
> ----------
> i all,
> 
> i think Avri's on to something here.  i agree with the points she's making.
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/registrar_stakeholder_group_gnso_works_against_ica
> nn_multistakeholder/
> 
> i haven't been tracking our positions on these motions -- i'm hoping that we're
> supporting the conclusions of the WG and resisting the inclination of the
> Council to rewrite the WG's conclusions.
> 
> mikey
>