[bc-gnso] BC position on competition, trust, choice v1
icann at rodenbaugh.com
Mon Apr 25 14:42:07 UTC 2011
I would add to the end of the Consumer Trust definition. "ICANN, and
relevant law." Thanks.
tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 5:07 AM
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: Philip Sheppard; 'bc-GNSO at icann.org GNSO list'
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] BC position on competition, trust, choice v1
i would add a clause to "Competition" that provides registrants with
multiple registrars, in addition to TLDs.
On Apr 24, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
Thanks again to Philip for his initial draft. The attached markup builds on
Philip's work in proposing these definitions:
Proposed definition for Competition in the context of the DNS and new gTLDs:
Competition is the availability of multiple suitable TLDs where registrants
may seek their desired domain name at reasonable prices and terms.
Proposed definition for Consumer Trust in the context of the DNS and new
Consumer Trust is the perceived integrity of domain name registrations such
that Internet users have confidence that a domain name is held to the
advertised purpose and standards of the TLD operator.
Proposed definition for Consumer Choice in the context of the DNS and new
Consumer Choice is the availability of TLDs that offer competing
propositions as the purpose and integrity of their domain name registrants.
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
<BC position on competition trust choice v1[Steve].doc>
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso