[bc-gnso] FNOI - NTIA - IANA Contract

[Michael D. Palage]

Marilyn,

I agree, although I am very optimistic that this SOW and FNOI will provide a much needed inflection point for ICANN to self correct.

Best regards,

Michael

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 12, 2011, at 6:32 PM, "Marilyn Cade " <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Just so we all on the same page of understanding this critically important public notice, I will add this to the BC agenda for Singapore. 
> 
> It is not a gTLD/GNSO policy issue but has significant implications for ICANN in governance/success,  thus  the officers will  join me in assessing how best to address this issue, inform BC members broadly to help understand implications, including geo political issues, and how ICANN can best pursue its interest in retaining the IANA. 
> 
> 
> It is both a technical and geo political issue. We will work to give the BC members facts, perspectives and dialogue. Whether the BC drafts comments is a separate issue and I am cautious on that front, but given governance issues, the BC will have a discussion in Singapore and thereafter, shortly after Singapore. 
> 
> If members want to discuss it bfly tomorrow on our call, raise it under AOB. 
> 
> 
> 
> Marilyn Cade
> BC Chair
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael at palage.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:59:14 
> To: <mmr at darwin.ptvy.ca.us>; <chris at andalucia.com>; <bc-gnso at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] FNOI - NTIA - IANA Contract
> 
> Mike,
>  
> I think that language is rather clear and unambiguous, thus not much need for speculation. 
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Michael 
>  
> 
> 
> From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Roberts
> Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 9:56 AM
> To: Chris Chaplow; 'bc - GNSO list'
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FNOI - NTIA - IANA Contract
>  
> 
> There will no doubt be speculation as to whether the following language puts a new hurdle in the new gTLD process:
> 
>  
> 
> As such, the Draft SOW includes, in paragraph C.2.2.1.3.2, a requirement that delegation requests for new gTLDs include documentation demonstrating how the string proposed reflects consensus among relevant stakeholders and is supportive of the global public interest.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> At 2:29 PM +0200 6/11/11, Chris Chaplow wrote:
> Dear Members,
>  
> For your interest
>  
> The further notice of inquiry (FNOI) will be published early next week in the US government's Federal Register, but has been posted early on the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) website. It will be accompanied by a 45-day public comment period.
>  
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/sites/news.dot-nxt.com/files/FR_IANA_FurtherNOI_06102011.pdf
>  
>  
>  
> Background
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/10/ntia-fnoi-iana
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Chris Chaplow
> Managing Director
> Andalucia.com S.L.
> Avenida del Carmen 9
> Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
> 1ª Planta, Oficina 30
> Estepona, 29680
> Malaga, Spain
> Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
> Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
> E-mail: chris at andalucia.com <mailto:chris at andalucia.com> 
> Web: www.andalucia.com <http://www.andalucia.com/> 
> Information about Andalucia, Spain.
>  
> 
>  
> 
>