[bc-gnso] Input needed from all members
ahalvorsen at witsa.org
Fri Mar 4 04:28:21 UTC 2011
I agree with Leigh on the inclusion of SSR. Also, the Affirmation of Commitments is important to WITSA and TechAmerica. Both of us put a lot of time into trying to protect ICANN and they don't work very well with the GAC, regardless of the topic. The meeting in Brussels seems to be a start on an improving relationship. With the risks externally, we should keep the AoC on the discussion list, as well as SSR and new gTLDs.
That would be three topics, as you requested.
WITSA's Jimson Olufuye was with Marilyn Cade and Theresa Swinehart at the recent CSTD Working Group on the improvements to the IGF. Maybe the idea of working more constructively with us, and others would be a good topic for the business community and the Board discussion. There are a lot of BC members who are involved in the IGF who will be in San Francisco.
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Leigh Williams
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 12:11 PM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: Bc GNSO list ; Greg Rattray
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Input needed from all members
I think SSR is a critical topic, and that the Board needs to know that
it matters to the BC. I don't think it needs to take a huge slice of
time in this slot, but I do believe it should be on the agenda.
Financial Services Roundtable
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf
Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 4:02 AM
To: Bc GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Input needed from all members
The Board and CSG interaction we are working toward and which is
tentative for Tuesday for one hour allows the CSG to propose three
Your excomm needs input from BC membership.
I have heard from some members: ideas are
AoC I implications for business users
Security, Stability and resiliency from Bs user perspective Sent via
BlackBerry by AT&T
More information about the Bc-gnso