[bc-gnso] BC discussion on limited round new gTLDS
BRUEGGEMAN, JEFF (ATTSI)
jb7454 at att.com
Mon Mar 14 19:03:47 UTC 2011
If there is not a limited round, then what are the priority issues that
should be addressed and what are the solutions to those open issues?
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf
Of philip.sheppard at aim.be
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 2:19 PM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] BC discussion on limited round new gTLDS
If we are to get any traction on the concept of a limited round we need
answer the question: how do you limit?
The answer has to provide ICANN with a reassurance of being able to do
in an equitable way , that would not be subject to litigation.
More information about the Bc-gnso