[bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
sdelbianco at netchoice.org
Thu Feb 9 01:13:40 UTC 2012
That's why we directed this request to Mikey and Chris instead of Phil.
No worries — I will amend our August comment and submit.
From: Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:47:27 +0000
To: Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com<mailto:mike at haven2.com>>, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Cc: Chris Chaplow <chris at andalucia.com<mailto:chris at andalucia.com>>, bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org>>
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
That’s for the current, ongoing IRTP-C WG, where they are still in the planning rather than very much substantive stages.
The comment period is for one recommendation from last year’s IRTP-B.
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
1155 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org> [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:20 PM
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: Chris Chaplow; bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one.
i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level.
sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't.
On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.
As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-b-rec9-part2-23jan12-en.htm>)?
This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.
From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400
To: <irtp-b-recommendations at icann.org<mailto:irtp-b-recommendations at icann.org>>
Cc: "'bc-GNSO at icann.org<mailto:'bc-GNSO at icann.org> GNSO list'" <bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org>>
Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.
If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate.
This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter.
Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2112/4796 - Release Date: 02/08/12
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso