[bc-gnso] ICANN Eliminates Board Meetings at ICANN Meetings
Deutsch, Sarah B
sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com
Tue May 1 12:52:11 UTC 2012
Thanks Marilyn. I agree with the concerns. If they wanted to remove one Act from the Theater of the Absurd, it should not be the public Board meeting.
Sarah B. Deutsch
Vice President & Associate General Counsel
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 6:41 AM
To: Phil Corwin; bc - GNSO list
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN Eliminates Board Meetings at ICANN Meetings
I will write today to the Chairs of the Constituencies/SGs/SOs to ask them their views and concerns. Crocker mentioned it in his comments, but it WAS not consulted with the community in any way.
I do think it is a problem for actually fulfilling the transparency of ICANN; however, I would like to hear from other members on your thoughts.
It is expensive for business to spend 6-7 days, but the Board will be now lessening its interactions with the community.
In my view, at this time, a bad move.
From: psc at vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>
To: bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org>
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN Eliminates Board Meetings at ICANN Meetings
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:59:26 +0000
In my opinion, a step backwards for transparency and accountability -- http://www.thedomains.com/2012/04/30/icann-eliminates-friday-public-board-meeting-at-future-conferences/ .
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
1155 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso