[bc-gnso] New US trademark rules likely to exclude many dot-brand gTLDs | DomainIncite - Domain Name News & Opinion

[Andy Abrams]

Thanks for sending, Phil.  I think these rules are very reasonable - it's
just unfortunate that the prohibitions on front-running and registering
generic terms were not incorporated into the LRO guidelines earlier.  It
would have saved everyone a lot of time and money.

Andy


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> http://domainincite.com/14139-new-us-trademark-rules-likely-to-exclude-many-dot-brand-gtlds
>
>
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> Virtualaw LLC
> 1155 F Street, NW
> Suite 1050
> Washington, DC 20004
> 202-559-8597/Direct
> 202-559-8750/Fax
> 202-255-6172/Cell
>
> Twitter: @VLawDC
>
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>
> Sent from my iPad
>



-- 
Andy Abrams | Trademark Counsel
*Google* | 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043
(650) 669-8752 <https://www.google.com/voice#phones>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20130813/3f451aaa/attachment.html>