[bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report
AHansen at council.bbb.org
Mon Jul 29 14:33:32 UTC 2013
I agree with Marie’s addition.
Anjali Karina Hansen Deputy General Counsel
Email: ahansen at council.bbb.org<mailto:ahansen at council.bbb.org>
bbb.org<http://www.bbb.org/> Start With Trust®
Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc.
3033 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600
Arlington, VA 22201
For consumer tips, scams and alerts: Read our blog
<http://www.bbb.org/blog/>Find us on: Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/bbb_us> | Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Better-Business-Bureau-US/25368131403> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1917928&trk=anet_ug_grppro> | YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/user/BBBconsumerTips> | Flickr<http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbb_us>
This message is a private communication, and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete the message from your system without printing, copying or forwarding it. Thank you.
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marie Pattullo
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:30 AM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: FW: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report
Thanks to Elisa & Steve; AIM fully supports a move towards thick WHOIS.
On page 2, can we please add one bullet:
Requiring a ‘thick’ WHOIS would:
• improve response consistency,
• improve stability,
• improve access to WHOIS data, and
• provide a more level playing field for competition between Registries.
• enhance consumer/user protection
Rationale: we’re supposed to be ensuring that the DN system works for the benefit of users – not just registrars/registries. Consumers should have the right to know to whom they are giving their data, including credit card details.
Many thanks for considering the above,
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org> [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Laura Covington
Sent: dimanche 28 juillet 2013 18:22
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org> list
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report
Looks good to us. Thanks, Elisa.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>> wrote:
As we've discussed before, there's a PDP (Policy Development Process) underway to consider requiring thick Whois for all gTLD registries — including legacy TLDs such as com and net.
The Working Group published its Initial Report (here<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-initial-21jun13-en.pdf%20>), concluding there are more benefits than disadvantages to requiring thick Whois for all gTLD registries. The Working Group recommends that thick Whois services should "become a requirement for all gTLD registries, both existing and future."
Public comment page is here<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/thick-whois-initial-21jun13-en.htm>.
Elisa Cooper prepared the attached draft of BC comments.
The reply comment period closes 4-Aug-2013, so please Reply All before 2-Aug with edits or questions.
And thanks to Elisa for preparing this draft.
Vice chair for policy coordination
<BC Comments - Thick Whois PDP WG Initial Report [Draft v1].doc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso