[bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report
randruff at rnapartners.com
Mon Jul 29 23:09:02 UTC 2013
RNA supports Marie’s important additions and the rest of the document as is.
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marie Pattullo
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:30
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: FW: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report
Thanks to Elisa & Steve; AIM fully supports a move towards thick WHOIS.
On page 2, can we please add one bullet:
Requiring a ‘thick’ WHOIS would:
• improve response consistency,
• improve stability,
• improve access to WHOIS data, and
• provide a more level playing field for competition between Registries.
• enhance consumer/user protection
Rationale: we’re supposed to be ensuring that the DN system works for the benefit of users – not just registrars/registries. Consumers should have the right to know to whom they are giving their data, including credit card details.
Many thanks for considering the above,
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org <mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org> [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Laura Covington
Sent: dimanche 28 juillet 2013 18:22
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso at icann.org <mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org> list
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report
Looks good to us. Thanks, Elisa.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco at netchoice.org <mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org> > wrote:
As we've discussed before, there's a PDP (Policy Development Process) underway to consider requiring thick Whois for all gTLD registries — including legacy TLDs such as com and net.
The Working Group published its Initial Report (here <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-initial-21jun13-en.pdf%20> ), concluding there are more benefits than disadvantages to requiring thick Whois for all gTLD registries. The Working Group recommends that thick Whois services should "become a requirement for all gTLD registries, both existing and future."
Public comment page is here <http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/thick-whois-initial-21jun13-en.htm> .
Elisa Cooper prepared the attached draft of BC comments.
The reply comment period closes 4-Aug-2013, so please Reply All before 2-Aug with edits or questions.
And thanks to Elisa for preparing this draft.
Vice chair for policy coordination
<BC Comments - Thick Whois PDP WG Initial Report [Draft v1].doc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso