[bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 8-JUNE: BC comments on Accountability and Transparency Review Team Questions

[Chris Chaplow]

Steve,

 

Thanks for picking this up.  I have tightened up the paragraph on the
attached redline in two ways:

 

Firstly the ‘contract amendment’ is a following part of the same process.

Secondly I have discovered that the whole RSEP process is actually a 2005
GNSO PDP (link)
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/registry-services/final-rpt-registry-approv
al-10july05>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/registry-services/final-rpt-registry-approva
l-10july05    so I think our recommendation needs to be to ask ATRT2 to a
check implementation against this. 

 

I would like to see a mandatory public comment period,  but as I read the
PDP in Step 4  it is not mandatory If ICANN determines during the 15
calendar day "preliminary determination" period that the proposed registry
service, does not raise significant Security or Stability (as defined
below), or competition issues, registry operator or sponsoring organisation
shall be free to deploy it upon such a determination.  

 

For the BC to ask for mandatory Public comment would be to ask for a new
PDP. Yes?   

 

Perhaps we should leave that to ATRT2 who, I assume, will find that a
complicated 2005 PDP is out of date in a new gTLD world.

 

Best

 

 

Chris Chaplow
Managing Director
Andalucia.com S.L.
Avenida del Carmen 9
Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
1ª Planta, Oficina 30
Estepona, 29680
Malaga, Spain
Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
E-mail:  <mailto:chris at andalucia.com> chris at andalucia.com
Web:  <http://www.andalucia.com/> www.andalucia.com
Information about Andalucia, Spain.

 

De: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] En nombre de
Steve DelBianco
Enviado el: viernes, 07 de junio de 2013 1:51
Para: bc-gnso at icann.org
Asunto: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 8-JUNE: BC comments on Accountability and
Transparency Review Team Questions

 

The second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT), mandated by
the Affirmation of Commitments,  is now defining its work program. ATRT
seeks input from the Community on questions for consideration.   Public
comment page is here
<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/atrt2-02apr13-en.htm> ; the
questions are here
<http://www.icann.org/about/aoc-review/atrt/community-questions-02apr13-en.p
df> .

 

On BC member calls today and on 22-May, we discussed areas where the BC
might comment on these questions. 

 

The attached draft includes text from Stephane Van Gelder and Steve
DelBianco.  The final two paragraphs reflect today's discussion by J. Scott
Evans and Chris Chaplow regarding consideration of public comments and
whether public input should be required for registry contract changes.

 

This comment period closes 9-June, so please Reply All by 8-June with any
specific edits.  

 

 

--

Steve DelBianco 

Vice chair for policy coordination

Business Constituency

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20130607/25a1836f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BC Comment on ATRT-2 questions [v1]-CC.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 167174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20130607/25a1836f/BCCommentonATRT-2questionsv1-CC.docx>