[bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs

Elisa Cooper Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com
Mon May 20 19:34:19 UTC 2013


Steve,

Thank you so much for all of your work on this.

Please find attached my edits to Sarah's draft.

As previously stated, I will recuse myself from comments related to Closed Generics. That said, I am concerned that the proposed comments in this draft may be at odds with our earlier position: http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20Comment%20on%20Closed%20Generic%20TLDs.pdf.

Thank you again.

Best,
Elisa

Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor

Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency

208 389-5779 PH

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Deutsch, Sarah B
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:29 PM
To: Steve DelBianco; bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs

Steve, All,

Thanks for your work on this draft. My comments are attached.   One big issue I would flag for members is the paragraph dealing with closed generics.   Various BC members have grave concerns about certain closed generics and formal objections have been filed.  The focus on applying for an exemption in the Final Guidebook does not fix these fundamental concerns for the reasons outlined in the attached.

I'd suggest that the BC either (a) refrain from taking a position on the closed generic issue altogether or (b) support the GAC's concerns about closed generics and the need to show that an award of an exclusive right in a generic term is in the larger public interest.

Sarah

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org> [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:40 PM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org>
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs

ICANN's new gTLD Board Committee has requested public comment on how it should address GAC advice to establish safeguards for categories of new gTLDs. (link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gac-safeguard-advice-23apr13-en.htm>)

The BC has have held 3 conference calls on this topic (see minutes and transcripts on the BC Wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsobc/Home>).  Several BC members provided input, including text from Ron Andruff, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.

Comment period closes 4-Jun.   That allows our regular 14-day review and approval period.  So, please REPLY ALL with your suggested edits and comments regarding this draft, before 29-May-2013.

Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
Business Constituency



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20130520/7d0d7780/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BC Comment on GAC Advice for new gTLDs DRAFT v2 erc.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 189952 bytes
Desc: BC Comment on GAC Advice for new gTLDs DRAFT v2 erc.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20130520/7d0d7780/BCCommentonGACAdvicefornewgTLDsDRAFTv2erc.docx>


More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list