[bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs

[Stéphane Van Gelder Consulting]

Thanks for doing that Elisa.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur
STEPHANE VAN GELDER CONSULTING

T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053
T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89
Skype: SVANGELDER
www.StephaneVanGelder.com
----------------
Follow us on Twitter: @stephvg and "like" us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/DomainConsultant
LinkedIn: fr.linkedin.com/in/domainconsultant/

Le 20 mai 2013 à 22:00, Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com> a écrit :

> I’ve also incorporated Stephane’s comments too.
>  
> Please find a revised version attached.
>  
> Best,
> Elisa
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Director of Product Marketing
> MarkMonitor
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Chair
> ICANN Business Constituency
>  
> 208 389-5779 PH
>  
> From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Elisa Cooper
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Steve DelBianco
> Cc: bc-gnso at icann.org
> Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs
>  
> Steve,
>  
> Thank you so much for all of your work on this.
>  
> Please find attached my edits to Sarah’s draft.
>  
> As previously stated, I will recuse myself from comments related to Closed Generics. That said, I am concerned that the proposed comments in this draft may be at odds with our earlier position:http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20Comment%20on%20Closed%20Generic%20TLDs.pdf.
>  
> Thank you again.
>  
> Best,
> Elisa
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Director of Product Marketing
> MarkMonitor
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Chair
> ICANN Business Constituency
>  
> 208 389-5779 PH
>  
> From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Deutsch, Sarah B
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:29 PM
> To: Steve DelBianco; bc-gnso at icann.org
> Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs
>  
> Steve, All,
> 
> Thanks for your work on this draft. My comments are attached.   One big issue I would flag for members is the paragraph dealing with closed generics.   Various BC members have grave concerns about certain closed generics and formal objections have been filed.  The focus on applying for an exemption in the Final Guidebook does not fix these fundamental concerns for the reasons outlined in the attached.
>  
> I’d suggest that the BC either (a) refrain from taking a position on the closed generic issue altogether or (b) support the GAC’s concerns about closed generics and the need to show that an award of an exclusive right in a generic term is in the larger public interest.   
>  
> Sarah
>  
> From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:40 PM
> To: bc-gnso at icann.org
> Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs
>  
> ICANN’s new gTLD Board Committee has requested public comment on how it should address GAC advice to establish safeguards for categories of new gTLDs. (link)
>  
> The BC has have held 3 conference calls on this topic (see minutes and transcripts on the BC Wiki).  Several BC members provided input, including text from Ron Andruff, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.  
>  
> Comment period closes 4-Jun.   That allows our regular 14-day review and approval period.  So, please REPLY ALL with your suggested edits and comments regarding this draft, before 29-May-2013.
>  
> Steve DelBianco
> Vice chair for policy coordination
> Business Constituency
>  
>  
>  
> <BC Comment on GAC Advice for new gTLDs DRAFT erc svg sd.docx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20130520/4365a54f/attachment.html>