[bc-gnso] RE: LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline is 18-Sep)
Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com
Mon Sep 16 14:34:20 UTC 2013
Thank you Steve.
Director of Product Marketing
ICANN Business Constituency
208 389-5779 PH
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 6:33 PM
To: bc-gnso at icann.org list
Subject: [bc-gnso] LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline is 18-Sep)
This is "Last Call" regarding proposed BC comments on Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) requirements (attached). This public comment (link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm>) closes 18-Sep.
Here's the history on this comment draft:
We circulated Elisa Cooper's initial draft on 26-Aug and discussed on our member call on 29-Aug.
Andy Abrams (Google) quickly suggested "a minimum 60-day combined sunrise/notice period as opposed to a minimum 30-day notice period and minimum 30-day sunrise period."
Liz (FairWinds), Laura (Yahoo), and Marie (AIM) agreed with Andy's suggestion. As did Elisa, who circulated a new draft on 3-Sep.
Members who would object to the attached comment should REPLY ALL by 17-Sep indicating concerns. Unless more than 5 members object, I will file these comments on 18-Sep.
Thanks to Elisa and Andy for their work on this comment.
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso