[bc-gnso] FILED: BC comment on changes to Bylaws and GNSO procedures for the Empowered Community

Phil Corwin psc at vlaw-dc.com
Thu Aug 10 18:31:34 UTC 2017


Excellent statement, Steve.

It's very concerning that Council's house divided against itself voting structure could prevent a GNSO supermajority from exercising its will on a critical EC issue.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VLawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>> wrote:

Today we filed a Business Constituency (BC) comment on proposed changes to Bylaws and GNSO procedures for the Empowered Community. (attached)

( ICANN comment page at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2017-06-19-en  )

This comment was drafted by Steve DelBianco and approved in accord with the BC charter.


<BC comment on GNSO procedures for the Empowered Community.pdf>
_______________________________________________
Bc-gnso mailing list
Bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:Bc-gnso at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bc-gnso
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20170810/abbf572e/attachment.html>


More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list