[bc-gnso] we have a 1-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures

[Steve DelBianco]

As discussed on our last BC members call, we requested a 2 week extension on this public comment period.

The IRP Implementation Oversight Team (IOR) working group granted us 1 week, since they have their own deadlines to analyze comments and prepare their final recommendations to the CCWG.

This comment is now due by 1-Feb-2017.

From: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry at icann.org>>
Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 at 5:01 PM
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Cc: BC Executive Committee <bc-excomm at icann.org<mailto:bc-excomm at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Ext] Request for 2-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures

Steve,

I wanted to confirm that the Co-Chair’s have approved a deadline extension for the IRP Public Comment period for one additional week.

I hope that this will provide sufficient time for your submission.

Thank you,

Karen Mulberry
Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI)
ICANN



From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 7:15 PM
To: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry at icann.org>>
Cc: BC Executive Committee <bc-excomm at icann.org<mailto:bc-excomm at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ext] Request for 2-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures

Hi, Karen.

As the staff contact for Updated Supplementary Procedures for the IRP[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_irp-2Dsupp-2Dprocedures-2D2016-2D11-2D28-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=Q_fMdPzWh_dPIFRoT0_RCyUZ-mS0xeE4EeQTxa_ckQI&m=WCws5VokF-q1trXfNjFDT4Bd1j1VoFNdzrbyH2mc7G0&s=ytvyKVEZ_Bqi2Qmydd-mrhrGmFwdVIYIN8R6fPb125k&e=>, we are contacting you to formally request a 2-week extension to the public comment period.

The period is scheduled to end 25-Jan, and we are requesting an extension to 8-Feb, at the earliest.

The justification to grant this extension is that we only just received a legal analysis and recommendations for the proposed procedures.    Sidley Austin, attorneys to the CCWG, prepared a legal memo (attached) that was shared with the BC membership only last week (12-Jan).   We’d like to incorporate some of Sidley’s analysis, and need additional time to have BC members review the changes.

I do not see any great urgency to the adoption of IRP procedures, so I hope this request can be granted.

Glad to field questions you may have about this request.

Regards,
Steve

Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20170124/86804c6e/attachment.html>