[bc-gnso] [Ext] BC Comment on ICANN Org planning assumptions for next gTLD expansion

Cyrus Namazi cyrus.namazi at icann.org
Tue Sep 10 16:33:10 UTC 2019


Hi Steve;

 

Thank you and the BC for your thoughtful comments and feedback.

 

We will review and update our planning assumptions with these and those of other community members and aim to publish an update soon.

 

Cheers,

 

Cyrus & Trang

 

From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 8:43 AM
To: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>
Cc: Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>, BC List <bc-gnso at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] BC Comment on ICANN Org planning assumptions for next gTLD expansion

 

Trang & Cyrus,

 

Thanks for giving us a brief extension on these comments regarding your assumptions regarding the next round of gTLDs.

 

Attached is a comment from the Business Constituency (BC).

 

Sincerely,

Steve DelBianco

Vice chair for policy coordination

ICANN Business Constituency

 

On 8/28/19, 4:25 PM, "Trang Nguyen" <trang.nguyen at icann.org> wrote:

 

Dear Chantelle,

 

Yes, the BC’s input will be considered. Thanks for informing us of the date that the input may be expected.

 

Best,

 

Trang

 

From: Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 1:22 PM
To: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>
Cc: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>, Claudia' <claudia.selli at intl.att.com>, Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>
Subject: Request for Extension from the Business Constituency (BC): Planning Assumptions for Subsequent Procedures for New gTLDs

 

Hi Trang and Cyrus,

 

The Business Constituency (BC) is preparing to submit feedback in regards to planning assumptions for Subsequent Procedures for New gTLDs. 

 

Their feedback will be ready by the end of business on Tuesday, 10 September.  We realize the due date is 30 August, but would you be able to consider content past then? 

 

This would allow the BC more time to respond based on recent input received from BC members. 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20190910/eae3bbed/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4597 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20190910/eae3bbed/smime.p7s>


More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list