<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Philip<div><br></div><div>The critical element is that one set of objectors cannot have a power of veto that others do not. An objector cannot also unfairly undermine legitimate which with they may just happen to disagreed. Circumventing a specialised process is exactly what 2.5 years of policy development was supposed to prevent.</div><div><br></div><div>I support the Council's position.</div><div><br></div><div>Liz<br><div><div><div> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div>...</div><div><br></div><div>Liz Williams</div><div>+44 1963 364 380</div><div>+44 7824 877 757</div><div><br></div></span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> </div><br><div><div>On 14 May 2009, at 13:20, Philip Sheppard wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span><span><GNSO Council to GAC May 2009 V4.doc></span></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></body></html>