<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns:odc="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:rtc="http://microsoft.com/officenet/conferencing" xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:Repl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/" xmlns:mt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/meetings/" xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" xmlns:ppda="http://www.passport.com/NameSpace.xsd" xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/soap" xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:udcp2p="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:dsss="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" xmlns:dssi="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig" xmlns:mdssi="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/digital-signature" xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" xmlns:spwp="http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/webpartpages" xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" xmlns:pptsl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/SlideLibrary/" xmlns:spsl="http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortalServer/PublishedLinksService" xmlns:Z="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:st="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"
xmlns:ns0="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=WordSection1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>This deserves some further response now, though I am sure plenty
more discussion to come as the Vertical Integration Working Group continues its
work.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>You list 3 reasons in favor of continued cross-ownership restrictions:
1) undefined “gaming” potential of “nefarious registrars” -- but what specific
harms are you seeking to avoid, are they prevented by cross-ownership
restrictions, and should all registrars be prevented from competing in the
newTLD operations market, simply because you might imagine a relative few “nefarious
actors”? 2) ICANN’s compliance function does not instill confidence in ICANN –
this is a meaningless red herring, first must identify the harms you seek to
prevent (other than “competition from registrars, some of whom might be
nefarious”), and 3) ICANN should wait til after this round to consider lifting
restrictions – but a next round may not occur for 3-5 years, and ICANN already
has the benefit of 10 years experience with hundreds of TLDs in the root,
including fully vertically integrated business models, so again this is just an
argument to benefit incumbent players and protect their markets for another
several years.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I look forward to further discussion, particularly once the VI-WG
publishes the recent work on ‘harms’ alleged to be caused by these
restrictions, as well as the ‘harms’ that allegedly would be caused if they are
eliminated.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Mike Rodenbaugh<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>RODENBAUGH LAW<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com/"><span style='color:blue'>http://rodenbaugh.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> owner-bc-gnso@icann.org
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Ron Andruff<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:10 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [bc-gnso] RE: Vested interests - status quo - market incumbents
- anti trust<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Dear
all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>I
take issue with Mike R’s comment: “</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>To me it seems obvious that
large incumbents are not keen to have competition from outsiders, as they
haven’t offered any good reason why these models shouldn’t be allowed, and
there are plenty of good reasons why they should be allowed.</span><span
style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>” This is patently
untrue. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>The
RACK proposal proposers [Tim <b>R</b>uiz (Go Daddy), Ron <b>A</b>ndruff, Brian <b>C</b>ute
(Afilias) and Kathy <b>K</b>leiman (PIR)] reasoned that it is inopportune to
allow an open VI regime at this time due to (1) the clear threat of gaming that
can be done by nefarious registrars with unfettered access to registrant data
and clear advantages regarding “drop” information and the like; (2) the lack of
a fully-formed/budgeted compliance department that has the capabilities (should
the VI WG be able to establish appropriate policy recommendations for
compliance to police) to give the user community confidence in the institution
of ICANN; and (3) with the potential for hundreds of new gTLDs being added into
the DNS in the coming decade, ICANN needs to gain the benefit of experience
with a tenfold increase in gTLDs BEFORE throwing open the doors to a no
restrictions environment. This group of proposers included a registrar,
two registries and me, and all of us are taking the longer view to ensure that
any changes in policy serve the interests of Internet users at large, rather
than a specific group that comes from within ICANN -- registrars. RACK
does not preclude any registrar investing in and owning up to 15% of a registry
or registry service provider. Which is the same as saying that new
registries are welcome to the marketplace, but registrars cannot have a
controlling interest in them – invest: YES; control: NO. To make a
blanket statement that incumbents are blocking competition is not only
misleading, it is categorically false.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>So,
Philip, before the BC goes off on a fool’s errand vis-à-vis anti-competitive
practices, a considerable amount of factual dialogue needs to take place on
this list. I’ll kick it off here with a question to Mike R: Who
exactly are the “outsiders” you note above? Registrars like ENOM that are
at the heart of VI, or are there other “outsiders” that I may have missed
hearing about during these last months of thousands of VI WG emails and
hundreds of hours of calls?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Kind
regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>RA</span><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>Ronald N. Andruff</span><span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>President<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:blue'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>RNA Partners, Inc.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>220 </span><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><ns0:Street
w:insAuthor="Owner" w:insDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z"><ns0:address w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z"><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>Fifth Avenue</span><span class=msoIns><ins cite="mailto:Owner"
datetime="2010-08-11T10:39"></ns0:address></ins></span></ns0:Street></span><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><ns0:place w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z"><ns0:City w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z"><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>New York</span><span class=msoIns><ins cite="mailto:Owner"
datetime="2010-08-11T10:39"></ns0:City></ins></span><span style='font-family:
"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>, </span><ns0:State w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z"><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>New York</span><span class=msoIns><ins cite="mailto:Owner"
datetime="2010-08-11T10:39"></ns0:State></ins></span><span style='font-family:
"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><ns0:PostalCode w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2010-08-11T10:39:00Z"><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>10001</span><span class=msoIns><ins cite="mailto:Owner"
datetime="2010-08-11T10:39"></ns0:PostalCode></ins></span></ns0:place></span><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span
style='color:blue'> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Mike
Rodenbaugh<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:51 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC Comment on Vertical Integration
Working Group Initial Report (to be filed 12-Aug)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>John,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>The WG has moved extraordinarily quickly, covering a large
number of big issues, leaving almost all of them in its wake for further
discussion because no consensus could be reached – there was “substantial
opposition” to almost every proposition! Regarding SRSU and SRMU models,
it was clear from the outset that there is substantial opposition to both, but
less for SRSU so, to the extent there was focus on any sort of “Single
Registrant” models, the focus was there. It was quickly apparent that
there would be no consensus about SRSU, either. To me it seems obvious
that large incumbents are not keen to have competition from outsiders, as they
haven’t offered any good reason why these models shouldn’t be allowed, and
there are plenty of good reasons why they should be allowed. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Nevertheless, to this point there hasn’t been much WG discussion
about any sort of ‘Single Registrant’ models in particular, other than to note
substantial support for the notion of SRSU… if consensus can be reached as to
details. The IPC has put forward some variations but none of them have
got substantial support as of yet. I do not think it possible to get the
support of parties who have a vested economic interest in the status quo, so
there will have to be enough consensus without their consent, or they and the
status quo will prevail for this next round of TLDs.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Mike Rodenbaugh<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>RODENBAUGH LAW<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com/">http://rodenbaugh.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
john@crediblecontext.com [mailto:john@crediblecontext.com] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:43 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Frederick Felman<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Ron Andruff; Steve DelBianco; bc - GNSO list; icann@rodenbaugh.com<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC Comment on Vertical Integration
Working Group Initial Report (to be filed 12-Aug)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><br>
I am confused on the point made by Mike and supported by Fred.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>Note this from page 32 of the VI report (the bold italics are
mine):<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>"11 Although the Working Group also initially discussed a
single-</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math","serif";
color:black'>‐</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>registrant, multiple-</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Cambria Math","serif";color:black'>‐</span><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'>user (SRMU) subcategory,
there was <b><i>substantial opposition</i></b> due to its complexity. Instead,
the working group focused on a Single Registrant Single User Exception.
Accordingly, only SRSU is identified in the main body of the report."<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>I think we would be on firmer ground to carve out a VI waiver
based on size rather than ownership. At a certain size, even a captive
gTLD could benefit from outside, expert technical support, no?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>Cheers,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>John Berard<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;
margin-left:6.0pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt' id=replyBlockquote>
<div id=wmQuoteWrapper>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'>-------- Original Message
--------<br>
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC Comment on Vertical Integration<br>
Working Group Initial Report (to be filed 12-Aug)<br>
From: "Frederick Felman" <<a
href="mailto:Frederick.Felman@markmonitor.com">Frederick.Felman@markmonitor.com</a>><br>
Date: Tue, August 10, 2010 10:24 am<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:icann@rodenbaugh.com">icann@rodenbaugh.com</a>><br>
Cc: "Ron Andruff" <<a href="mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com">randruff@rnapartners.com</a>>,
"Steve DelBianco"<br>
<<a href="mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org">sdelbianco@netchoice.org</a>>,
"bc - GNSO list" <<a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org">bc-gnso@icann.org</a>><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>I'd agree with Mike in this case. It's the model that many Big
brands are considering. <br>
<br>
Sent from +1(415)606-3733<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><br>
On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:53 AM, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <<a
href="mailto:icann@rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">icann@rodenbaugh.com</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;
margin-left:6.0pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I disagree that Single Registrant – Multiple User models have no
support in the WG. To the contrary, those models would be freely allowed
under the “free trade” proposals that have garnered a lot of support in the WG
– in fact receiving more support than either of the other major alternatives in
the last straw poll of the WG. More importantly to our Members, such
models may very well be desirable for many businesses who wish to own and
operate a new gTLD, and so we should support that flexibility as there does not
appear to be any additional or substantial harm that would be caused by those
business models.</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Mike Rodenbaugh</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>RODENBAUGH LAW</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087</span><span style='font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com/" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a></span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'> </span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in;
border-color:-moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color'>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black'> <a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org" target="_blank">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Ron Andruff<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, August 09, 2010 12:34 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Steve DelBianco'; 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC Comment on Vertical Integration
Working Group Initial Report (to be filed 12-Aug)</span><span style='font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Steve,</span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Thanks
for the updated comments. I have made a couple of edits/comments, as
noted in the attached draft. I specifically commented on the Single
Registrant Multiple User (SRMU), which has not gotten any traction, rather only
push back from the broader working group. The BC should take note of this
and perhaps modify its language in this regard.</span><span style='font-family:
"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Thanks.</span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>Kind
regards,</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'>RA</span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>Ronald N. Andruff</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>President</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>RNA Partners, Inc.</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>220 Fifth Avenue</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>New York</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>, New York 10001</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:blue'> </span><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black'> <a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org" target="_blank">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Steve DelBianco<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 06, 2010 1:24 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [bc-gnso] Proposed BC Comment on Vertical Integration Working
Group Initial Report (to be filed 12-Aug)</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>To: BC members<br>
From: BC executive committee<br>
<br>
On Thursday 5-Aug, your executive committee held a call with several BC members
who are devoting much of their time to the Vertical Integration (VI) Working
Group. ( Ron Andruff, Berry Cobb, Mike Palage, and Jon Nevett ) <br>
<br>
The discussion revealed that the Working Group is not likely to reach consensus
for any single plan. However, there are principles which may emerge with
significant support. The initial report of the Working Group is
presently posted for public comment, with a due date of 12-Aug. (see <a
href="http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#vi-pdp-initial-report" target="_blank">http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#vi-pdp-initial-report</a>
)<br>
<br>
The BC already has an approved position on VI, which was posted in Sep-2009.
However, we believe that the BC needs to make key clarifications of
our Sep-2009 position in order to make it more relevant the VI Working Group’s
initial draft report:</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>1. define what the BC meant by “status quo” in our statement
“the BC opposes any change to the status quo for all TLDs intended for sale to
third parties”<br>
<br>
2. define what the BC meant by “internal use” in our statement “The BC
believes that uniquely for domain names intended for internal use, the
principle of registry-registrar vertical separation should be waived.”<br>
<br>
3. encourage continued work to define eligibility and scope for Single
registrant – Single User exception. </span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><br>
We drafted a comment along these lines and have posted it here for your review
and comment. The executive committee plans to file these comments by
12-August deadline. (comment attached)<br>
<br>
Again, these are meant to be clarifications of existing position — not a new
comment that would be subject to the 14-day review period required by our
charter. <br>
<br>
But as you review these comments, please feel free to raise new issues that go
beyond clarifying our Sep-2009 position, since your thoughts will be extremely
helpful to the BC members on this working Group and to our GNSO Councilors.
For example, please think about how to distinguish ‘registered
users’ of a dot-brand owner from ‘registrants’ of an ICANN-accredited
registrar. <br>
<br>
<br>
--Steve DelBianco</span><span style='font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>