<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance.<div>.... and yes, I will put in a <div>discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><br><br>> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100<br>> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are<br>> From: philip.sheppard@aim.be<br>> To: john@crediblecontext.com<br>> CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org<br>> <br>> <br>> I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain<br>> portflio management was a joke.<br>> <br>> Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????<br>> <br>> Philip<br>> <br>> <br>> > Marilyn,<br>> > As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better<br>> > reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors<br>> > used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN<br>> > finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket:<br>> > To prevent:<br>> > FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce<br>> ><br>> > To promote:<br>> > Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk<br>> > managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks<br>> > From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate<br>> > with companies.<br>> > Just some raw material for consideration.<br>> > Berard<br>> ><br>> <br>> <br></div></div> </body>
</html>