<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"
xmlns:ns1="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"
xmlns:ns0="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType
namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="PostalCode"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="State"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="City"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="place"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="Street"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="address"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--a:link
{mso-style-priority:99;}
span.MSOHYPERLINK
{mso-style-priority:99;}
a:visited
{mso-style-priority:99;}
span.MSOHYPERLINKFOLLOWED
{mso-style-priority:99;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;}
p.MSOACETATE
{mso-style-priority:99;}
li.MSOACETATE
{mso-style-priority:99;}
div.MSOACETATE
{mso-style-priority:99;}
span.BALLOONTEXTCHAR
{mso-style-priority:99;}
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{font-family:Tahoma;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:blue;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>I think we were all somewhat asleep this
morning, <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Berry</st1:place></st1:State>,
because I couldn’t find the motions on the GNSO website to save my
soul. Thanks to Zahid and Marilyn for sending the link along.
Perhaps including a link to the motions could be added to the next “BC call”
agenda? <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Thank you for adding some further
perspective from a member of the working group to the topic Mike brought up. While
I am not up to speed on the topic itself to comment on it, I, too, find it
troubling at best that the Council would selectively build motions, if I
understood you correctly. The whole reason for the GNSO revamp was to put
the determination of issues in the hands of WGs and therefore, the work product
resulting from each Working Group must be respected in toto or be sent back to
the WG to polish and resubmit to the Council for another look. In my
view, “selective process” policy establishment is an improper response
to any Working Group’s efforts, so this should be investigated further
immediately.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Perhaps the Chair and ExCom can work with
our councilors take a lead here? Your thoughts Marilyn?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>RA<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Ronald N. Andruff</span></font><font
color=blue><span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>RNA Partners, Inc.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><ns0:Street w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z"><ns0:address w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z"></ns0:address></ns0:Street><ns0:place
w:insAuthor="Owner" w:insDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z"><ns0:City w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z"></ns0:City><ns0:State w:insAuthor="Owner"
w:insDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z"></ns0:State><ns0:PostalCode
w:insAuthor="Owner" w:insDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z" w:endInsAuthor="Owner"
w:endInsDate="2011-01-10T16:00:00Z"></ns0:PostalCode></ns0:place><font
color=blue><span style='color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><font
size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'> </span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] <b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Berry Cobb<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Monday, January 10, 2011
2:48 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: [bc-gnso] council
agenda for Jan 13 - Motion #5 RAP</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>I guess I was a
sleep at the wheel this morning for the call. I had not seen the GNSO
motions prior to our call, and after hearing the discussion this AM, I knew
something seemed suspicious. The early morning fog prevented me from
responding. Thanks to Mike for posting this to the list.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>As this motion #5 on
RAP stands, I support a vote of “NO”. At the very least, this
motion does not consider all the recommendations of the RAP and it does not
make any reference to all the other RAP recommendations. Why would the
remainder of the RAP recommendations be omitted? I am not familiar with
how the Council reviews, submits motions, and votes on WG recommendations, but
I find this current motion creating a gap and perhaps jeopardizing the WG
process. Being a member of the RAP-IDT, helping to create a priority
list, I guess I never expected a motion resulting in a “hunt &
peck” exercise. Lastly, I do not want to speculate on the
motivation of the Contracted Parties, who are the ones that submitted and
seconded this motion, but I do think Mike touches on a fair question of why the
current motion bypasses higher ranked RAP recommendations, like the Best
Practices effort on Malicious Use (which received unanimous consensus by the
RAP WG). Swiss cheese with lots of holes is my is my gut feel.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>WRT to the Fast Flux
motion & recommendations, I cannot comment as I did not participate and
this was before my time at ICANN. However, one result of that WG also
contains a “best practices” recommendation. While I do not
want to delay the FF efforts, I believe there to be more momentum for the RAP
Best Practices Recommendation to act as the pilot for Best Practices Efforts
within the ICANN\GNSO span of control. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>WRT to the UDRP
recommendation from RAP…..I agree with Mike that this will be fight,
although that was not prevalent when the WG developed Unanimous Consensus on
this recommendation. The UDRP recommendation priority created a lot of
friction within the RAP-IDT. And if I recall correctly from our BC session
this morning, a few of our members support delaying this PDP on UDRP. I
will remind that the BC did submit a position on the RAP Interim Report
supporting this recommendation, although no formal position was established on
the RAP Final Report. Personally, I see fractures of the UDRP on both
sides (brand holders vs domain investors). It is time to review, update,
and improve the UDRP. I support its current prioritization as defined by
the RAP IDT. In same breath, if this will put us at odds with the IPC, I
can also support saving this battle for another day.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>To add clarification
to Mike’s comments about the RAP Uniformity of Contracts
recommendation……… The conundrum about this
recommendation is that it only received “strong support but significant
opposition” during the Pre-PDP WG efforts. However, within the
RAP-IDT efforts to prioritize all the recommendations, it received a third or
fourth place priority over “unanimous consensus” RAP
recommendations. The RAP-IDT deliberated this issue some, and the
conclusion is that the GNSO council should address this by first voting the
UofC recommendation up or down first and then figure out if and how to move
forward.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Bottom line, I
recommend the BC & our Councilors support the priority assignment
recommendations from the RAP IDT team and any motion presented to the GNSO
Council about RAP efforts should be all encompassing. Vote each RAP
recommendation Up or Down, then assign the “UP” recommendations to
the Prioritization Queue for WGs, and build a sense of urgency to get things
moving along.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Thanks, B<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><font size=2
color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;
color:#1F497D'>Berry</span></font></st1:place></st1:State><font size=2
color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;
color:#1F497D'> Cobb<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Infinity Portals LLC<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>berrycobb@infinityportals.com<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>http://infinityportals.com<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>720.839.5735<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> owner-bc-gnso@icann.org
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of
</span></b>Mike Rodenbaugh<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Monday, January 10, 2011
7:31 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: [bc-gnso] council
agenda for Jan 13<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Thanks Marilyn for
forwarding, I guess I’ve been deleted from the Council list… so
will ask to be added again.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>I have some concern
about the resolutions re Fast Flux and especially re Registration Abuse
Policies. I think folding the FF recos into the RAP recos is ok in
concept, but we can see that the contract parties are trying to bury that
portion of the work re ‘best practices’. It was identified as
the top priority after the two ‘low hanging fruit’ items identified
by the RAP-Implementation Drafting Team. Yet, the motion addresses only
those two items and the UDRP review, which was identified as 3d priority.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>I know the IPC will
vehemently fight against UDRP review now. My strong view is it is not
time for that fight yet either, it will be a big fight… and that the
non-controversial yet difficult Best Practices work should be done first as
recommended by the Implementation Team, and indeed that work might help to
inform the UDRP review effort. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Also Item IV of the
RAP-IDT recos, Uniformity of Contracts, is a key issue for all non-contracting
party stakeholders. By mass in RAP-IDT, the contracting parties got a low
priority, but from our perspective it should be a bigger priority that UDRP
review. At minimum, there should be a plan to start that work, as well as
the Best Practices work, before any agreement on UDRP review is made.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Curious how other
members, particularly those that have been active in the RAP group, thing about
these motions pending before Council.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>Mike Rodenbaugh<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>RODENBAUGH LAW<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'>tel/fax: +1
(415) 738-8087<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><a
href="http://rodenbaugh.com/">http://rodenbaugh.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color="#1f497d" face=Calibri><span
style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] <b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Marilyn Cade<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Monday, January 10, 2011
6:47 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> bc - GNSO list<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [bc-gnso] council agenda
for Jan 13<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=apple-style-span><font size=3 color=black
face=Helvetica><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black'><a
href="http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-13jan11-en.htm">http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-13jan11-en.htm</a></span></font></span><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>