<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I support Ron's suggestion too, in part because there are so many outstanding issues. If the Board realistically cannot respond to all of these substantive issues at this point in the process, then a general remedy to address the concerns is to limit the initial round and allow a fact-based review of that round to inform the process. And I think that is in the interest of the business community too as a way to provide a path forward, recognizing that all of our concerns have not been addressed. </div><div><br></div><div>Jon, you raise good points about the practical concerns, but can't the starting point be a numerical limit based on the timing of when applications make it through the process. I would think that would reward applicants that are ready to move quickly and do not trigger the objection or conflict process. </div><div><br></div><div>Jeff</div><div><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:36 PM, "Mustala, Tero (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <<a href="mailto:tero.mustala@nsn.com">tero.mustala@nsn.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial">I tend
to agree with Jon. Also if you read the GAC communique, you might see that the
governments are quite definite with some of their concerns.</font></span></div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font></span> </div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial">regards</font></span></div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font></span> </div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial">Tero</font></span></div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font></span> </div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<p><span lang="fi"><font color="#000080" size="1" face="Palatino Linotype">Tero
Mustala</font></span> <br><span lang="fi"><font color="#000080" size="1" face="Palatino Linotype">Principal Consultant,</font></span> <br><span lang="fi"><font color="#000080" size="1" face="Palatino Linotype">CTO/Industry
Environment</font></span> <br><span lang="fi"><font color="#000080" size="1" face="Palatino Linotype">Nokia Siemens Networks</font></span> <br><span lang="fi"><font color="#000080" size="1" face="Palatino Linotype"><a href="mailto:tero.mustala@nsn.com">tero.mustala@nsn.com</a></font></span> </p></span></div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font></span> </div>
<div><span class="800291500-14032011"><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font></span> </div><br>
<div dir="ltr" lang="en-us" class="OutlookMessageHeader" align="left">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>ext Jon
Nevett<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 14, 2011 2:06 AM<br><b>To:</b> Phil
Corwin<br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com">randruff@rnapartners.com</a>; <a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com">marilynscade@hotmail.com</a>;
<a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>; <a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org"><a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org">bc-gnso@icann.org</a></a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [bc-gnso]
urgent update to all BC members -- regarding BC statement regardingBoard-GAC
Scorecard issues<br></font><br></div>
<div></div>Probably not a surprise, but I do not support (2) -- how would you
decide which ones to move forward on? For example, why RPMs in generics
would be more important than in .nyc? Do you do it randomly? Not
sure the equity in that -- and would it be a problematic lottery?
<div><br></div>
<div>Thanks.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Jon<br>
<div><br></div>
<div><br>
<div><br></div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On Mar 13, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Phil Corwin wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite"><span style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px" class="Apple-style-span">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" class="hmmessage"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125); FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Good
suggestions, Ron. I'm in general support.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></font><br> <br>
<div style="BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-TOP: rgb(181,196,223) 1pt solid; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><font style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><b>From</b>: Ron
Andruff [mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com]<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br><b>Sent</b>: Sunday, March 13,
2011 06:53 PM<br><b>To</b>: Marilyn Cade <<a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com"><a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com">marilynscade@hotmail.com</a></a>>;<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org"><a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><<a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org"><a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a></a>>; bc -
GNSO list <<a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org"><a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org">bc-gnso@icann.org</a></a>><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br><b>Subject</b>: Re: [bc-gnso]
urgent update to all BC members -- regarding BC statement regardingBoard-GAC
Scorecard issues<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br></font> <br></div>Marilyn
and all,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br><br>In discussions
with Peter DT, he has made it clear that Monday's comment session is critical
to coming to closure with the GAC. It is clear that GAC members must take
something home for their ministers, so we need to give some serious thought to
what those things might be. Two ideas that come to mind are (1) recommend that
all community based applications be allowed to apply simultaneously for their
IDN equivalents or a small fee per string, which would lead to each nation
being able to use non-English / non-ASCII scripts (and therein a "win"); and
(2) suggest that a way to get past the impass of too many "2"s in the
scorecard would be to go forward with a limited round to start so that we can
all see if the current AGB (as suggested by the Board) is functional or needs
the modifications currently revcommended by the GAC. In any case, according to
PDT, we cannot leave SFO without resolution. IMHO, that must be the message we
share with all we meet in the meeting rooms and halls....<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br><br>Kind regards,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br><br>RA<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<div style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px">________________________________________<br>Ron
Andruff<br>RNA Partners, Inc.<br><a href="mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com"><a href="mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com">randruff@rnapartners.com</a></a><br><a href="http://www.rnapartners.com"><a href="http://www.rnapartners.com">www.rnapartners.com</a></a></div>
<hr>
<div><b>From:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Marilyn Cade
<<a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com"><a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com">marilynscade@hotmail.com</a></a>></div>
<div><b>Sender:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b><a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org"><a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a></a></div>
<div><b>Date:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Sun, 13 Mar
2011 16:22:51 -0400</div>
<div><b>To:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>bc - GNSO
list<<a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org"><a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org">bc-gnso@icann.org</a></a>></div>
<div><b>Subject:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>[bc-gnso]
urgent update to all BC members -- regarding BC statement regarding Board-GAC
Scorecard issues</div>
<div><br></div>During a meeting with Kurt Pritz, V.President, ICANN with the
GNSO and the GNSO Council, he announced that there is agreement to have short
statements from the Chairs of the SOs/ACs and SGs at the beginning of the
session on Monday that reviews the Board and GAC Scorecard Document [showing
1a, 1b, and 2].
<div><br></div>
<div>I am going to convene a process to draft a statement from the BC [we
don't have a CSG chair/and at this point, the position I have given to the
chairs within the CSG is that we will each make a statement for our
Constituency. I intend that we will have a statement, since we have a lot at
risk to ensure that the input of the BC's Constituency members are reflected
in the statement.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Zahid and John are going to have a heavy work load on this -- they have
Council to 'guide' [and have done a great job already on that in the
discussions so far. ]</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I will be conferring with excomm on how to do a statement and clear it
with you all/stay closely
tuned.</div></div></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><Brussels Intersessional Meeting- GAC Communique.pdf></div></blockquote></body></html>