BC Members Call Adobe Connect Chat 11 July 2011 10.00 hrs EST =============================================================== Chris Chaplow: Hi Berry, first in Berry Cobb: Hey Chris. Berry Cobb: Glad we're using this now. Berry Cobb: need to get all members on and we can do hand raising here. Chris Chaplow: yes, did you loose Adobe for a second just then, my internet connect was lost for 10 sec Berry Cobb: all good on my end Zahid Jamil: hi everyone Mikey OConnor: hi Zahid.. Chris Chaplow: just learning this one, converting Steves calendar to PDF to put on main window Berry Cobb: They certianly will have a challenge to raise awareness with the $750k in the latest RFP. Mikey OConnor: It would be nice if Marilyn and Steve could have had this debate before we have to sit through it all Mikey OConnor: Why don't you ExComm folks do a pre-call to iron this stuff out in advance... Ron A: Good morning, Gents. Chris Chaplow: Morning Ron Chris Chaplow: Interesting , I was going to say, there is a huge spectrum of cc whois Steve DelBianco: and on that spectrum are some ccTLDs who don't reveal any Whois, right? Steve DelBianco: To Mikey: a lot of Marilyn's suggestions come to her "in the moment" so I share your frustration, Mikey Chris Chaplow: I dont know of examples of that but some require paper substantion of identy etc to register or transfer Steve DelBianco: Zahid -- are you ready for the Channel 2 walk-thru? Chris Chaplow: Zahid must have dropped out of Adobe but he is on Verizon call meeting view Steve DelBianco: Mikey and Berry -- please be ready to weigh-in on the council motions regarding PEDNR and RAP Chris Chaplow: I was surprised to see another public comment on the IRTP recs. Mikey OConnor: that's the Board layer -- does seem a little redundant, but it's part of the deal. Chris Chaplow: support motion as is, no mods Mikey OConnor: yep, me too. Berry Cobb: me three Berry Cobb: @Steve, I agree WRT to PDP process stuff be separate from the BC take on the IRTP recommendations. Berry Cobb: we did have Rr support in IRTP Steve DelBianco: I heard that registrars objected to .net taking on thick whois Chris Chaplow: I think so, it was just the UNKNOWN that held us back Berry Cobb: all I can confirm is the consensus from Rr on the IRTP Chris Chaplow: ho ho Berry Cobb: Im under the impression that they take their views back to their constituency. Berry Cobb: man those below the belt punches sting.... Ron A: Agreed, Mikey. Palage: How long is this call secheduled to go on for? Mikey OConnor: i think it ends now? Palage: Did not get that far through the agenda' Palage: about 1/2 right now Mikey OConnor: yep Berry Cobb: And when it goes back toWG, all stakeholders are welcome to join. Yes? Palage: Congratulations Mikey - you have now graduated ICANN Policy 101 - you may now move forward to your graduate work Mikey OConnor: LOL!! Palage: You have seen the light Palage: Unfortunately people need to invest years in order to "experience " the unique ICANN bottom up consensus driven model at work Mikey OConnor: Berry - yep, the WG never closed so anybody can join Mikey OConnor: Michael -- agreed -- but the WGs are a great place to do that. Chris Chaplow: Does a working group ever formally diband? Chris Chaplow: sorry disband Berry Cobb: when they close the email group? Chris Chaplow: close email list without ceremony or advising the members Mikey OConnor: how long *IS* this call scheduled for? Chris, do you know? it sounds like we're headed for 2 hours. is that right? Berry Cobb: Couldnt JAS lead to bylaw changes? Chris Chaplow: It is certainly looking that way. I don't remember any specific advanced timing Steve DelBianco: if the JAS WG report only gives a minor mention of bundling, could GNSO Council call attention to the idea as part of their endorsement? Ron A: That would be VERY helpful Steve. Steve DelBianco: agree. though it does "tinker" with the WG report doesn't it Chris Chaplow: 2,3,4,6,8 clauses Ron A: @ Steve: It is more about acknowledging that the GAC, ALAC, BC and others are supporting this movement... Mikey OConnor: just reviewed the RAP resolution. another 2 years down the drain. no action forthcoming. bah. i hate it. Mikey OConnor: Berry, i just sent you an email with the non-actions highlighted. Steve DelBianco: Mikey & Berry -- is the resolution accurate when it says that no consensus was achieved w/r/t the no-action items? Chris Chaplow: Hotel Des Almadies in Dakar Mikey OConnor: Steve, yeah those last ones are fine. we didn't get to consensus. but we *did* get to consensus on the rest. Steve DelBianco: are we "testing" Adobe? No need for that! Palage: shout out to those on the bleeding edge Mikey OConnor: woohoo! Ron A: +1 Chris! Berry Cobb: great tool to help gauge consensus on the fly for pdp too. Mikey OConnor: we hate the RAP resolution though... Chris Chaplow: no we are testing the software but my management of it Chris Chaplow: For the next call I suggest Bene provide link to chat and brief instruction in the call announcement email Chris Chaplow: This is permanant link to the BC Adobe Connect https://icann.adobeconnect.com/busnsconst Steve DelBianco: so long, guys. Got to drop now. Chris Chaplow: Bye Thanks Steve Ron A: Gotta go... See/talk soon. Berry Cobb: have to run. Thanks all. Mikey OConnor: bye all, me too ========== end 12.20 hrs EST ===========