<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">FYI -- <a href="http://internetcommerce.org/WIPO_LRO">http://internetcommerce.org/WIPO_LRO</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:15.0pt;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:15.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:26.25pt">
<b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:17.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS","sans-serif";color:#405688">ICANN Names WIPO as Exclusive Arbitrator of Legal Rights Objections to New gTLDs – But When Will ICANN Begin Work on Implementation Details of the URS?<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#5D5C6A">Submitted by Philip Corwin on Fri, 02/17/2012 - 20:15
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">ICANN has designated the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) as the exclusive provider of arbitration services to resolve disputes when a Legal Rights Objection (LRO) is lodged against a proposed
new gTLD. An LRO can be lodged by a trademark owner or intergovernmental organization when an applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym.</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">As noted in WIPO’s explanation of its LRO arbitration role (available at
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">),
this is but one of several new objections that can be raised by various parties against a proposed new gTLD:</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<i><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">To address potential disputes over new gTLD applications, ICANN offers three other types of pre-delegation objection-based dispute resolution procedures which are not administered by WIPO, namely, “String
Confusion Objection,” “Limited Public Interest Objection,” and “Community Objection.” For the latter two types of objections, ICANN is also making available an “Independent Objector” by way of public service. ICANN has furthermore established a process for
the ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) to provide “GAC Advice on New gTLDs” concerning applications identified by governments as problematic.</span></i><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">LRO disputes will generally be decided by a single expert, unless the parties to the dispute agree on a 3-member panel. In either case, the panel will determine whether the potential use of the applied-for
gTLD by the applicant:</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">·</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:black">
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">takes unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the reputation of the objector’s registered or unregistered trademark or service mark (“mark”) or IGO name or acronym,
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">·</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:black">
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">unjustifiably impairs the distinctive character or the reputation of the objector’s mark or IGO name or acronym, or
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:black">·</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:black">
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">otherwise creates an impermissible likelihood of confusion between the applied-for gTLD and the objector’s mark or IGO name or acronym.
</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">In a single expert proceeding, each party will pay a $10,000 fee. Of that fee, $2,000 from each party will go to WIPO to cover administrative costs; the prevailing party will receive an $8,000 refund, with
that amount being charged to the losing party for the expert’s fee. ICANN is obliged to accept WIPO’s LRO determinations.</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">We believe it is reasonable for ICANN to select a single provider of LRO dispute resolution services as the likely number of cases should be limited. Notwithstanding the pre-launch concerns voiced by some
trademark interests, it’s likely that the multiple types of objections that can be raised against new gTLDs, as well as the prospect of losing an $185,000 application fee and other considerable preparatory costs, will likely keep such disputes to a minimum.</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">As noted, the LRO and other objection processes are pre-delegation remedies, and once a new gTLD actually launches it is subject to additional rights protection mechanisms. They are described by WIPO as follows:</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<i><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Beyond the above-described pre-delegation objection procedures (available prior to any new gTLD being approved and becoming operational), ICANN has established a range of “Rights Protection Mechanisms”
(RPMs). These include a Trademark Clearinghouse (for use in connection with Sunrise periods and Trademark Claims services), a Uniform Rapid Suspension system (URS), and a Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PDDRP). In addition, the existing Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (</span></i><i><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><a href="http://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp.htm"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue">UDRP</span></a></span></i><i><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">)
will be applicable to all new gTLDs. More information on these RPMs can be found in the WIPO Center’s overview of
</span></i><i><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue">Trademark Rights Protection Mechanisms for
New gTLDs</span></a></span></i><i><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">.</span></i><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">ICA has been participating in and monitoring the work of the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG) for the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMC), which has been dealing with technical and process issues arising from
the creation of a large global database of protected marks.</span><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">However, ICANN is woefully behind on developing the implementation details for Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS), the expedited supplement to the UDRP that is of most relevance and concern to domain registrants
and portfolio owners. ICANN staff had indicated at the Dakar meeting that a URS IAG would be launched within a month after that October 2011 gathering, but more than a quarter year later we have yet to see any progress on this front.</span></b><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">That unexplained delay may well be due to ICANN’s implausible promise to trademark owners that the URS would carry a fee of only $300 for objections to one or more domains held by the same registrant.
ICA consistently questioned whether any credible due process could be provided at such a bargain basement price. Both WIPO and the National Arbitration Forum NAF have publicly stated that, with IP attorney arbitrator fees averaging $650 per hour, there is
no way they can procure the services of credible experts at that price, much less cover their own administrative costs. In this regard we note that that Rapid Evaluation Service (RES), now available for suspension of infringing .xxx domains exclusively through
NAF, carries the same price tag as a UDRP - $1200. </span></b><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt">
<b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">If an implementation process for URS has not been announced by the time of the ICANN meeting in San Jose, Costa Rica next month, ICA will be asking ICANN’s Board and staff to explain the delay, and ask
when steps will be taken to assure that the URS is a credible process affording adequate due process to domain registrants. We will also continue to insist that any URS provider be placed under a standard binding contract that sets forth the extent of its
powers and provides ICANN with flexible and escalating enforcement tools, and that protections are included to prevent forum shopping if more than one URS provider is designated.</span></b><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:15.6pt"><b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">And, needless to say, ICA will participate in the URS IAG once it is initiated to assure that this new process is fair to registrants
and is truly a limited supplement to, and not a broad substitute for, the UDRP.</span></b><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#5D5C6A"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Virtualaw LLC</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">1155 F Street, NW</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Suite 1050</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Washington, DC 20004</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">202-559-8597/Direct</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">202-559-8750/Fax</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">202-255-6172/cell</span></b><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:navy"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">Twitter: @VlawDC</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:navy">"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey</span></i></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>