Great news! It's satisfying to see these wins. Kudos to those whose efforts got us there!<div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Angie</div><div>Angie Graves</div><div>WEB Group, Inc.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Steve DelBianco <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org" target="_blank">sdelbianco@netchoice.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
ICANN posted a revised new gTLD Registry agreement (<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-05feb13-en.htm" target="_blank">link</a>) and comment periods yesterday. </div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Buried in there are 4 points the BC has pressed for the past year:</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Our first point: there's a new Public Interest Commitments page (Specification 11) in the new Ry agreement. It requires use of
<u>only</u> registrars using the latest RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement). This was #6 on our Toronto list (<a href="http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/Consensus%20Improvements%20to%20RPMs%20for%20new%20gTLDs.pdf" target="_blank">link</a>) and #4 in our Jan-2012
letter (<a href="http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20request%20for%20implementation%20improvements.pdf" target="_blank">link</a>).</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Second point: Specification 11 also says that all commitments and statements of intent from the new gTLD application are incorporated by reference in the Ry agreement. And they will be
<u>enforceable</u> by ICANN. This was #7 on our Toronto list (<span style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><a href="http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/Consensus%20Improvements%20to%20RPMs%20for%20new%20gTLDs.pdf" target="_blank">link</a></span><span style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">)
and #1 in our Jan-2012 letter (</span><span style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><a href="http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20request%20for%20implementation%20improvements.pdf" target="_blank">link</a></span><span style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">).</span></div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Score another point for our quest to let dot-brand TLDs <u>skip</u> having to use all registrars. We first pressed for this in 2010 (<a href="http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20on%20Final%20App%20Guidebook.pdf" target="_blank">link</a>) There was already an
exemption request available, but now it's in the base agreement:</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">2.9(a) All domain name registrations in the TLD must be registered through an ICANN accredited registrar; provided, that Registry Operator need not use a registrar if it registers names in its own
name in order to withhold such names from delegation or use in accordance with Section 2.6.</font></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Finally, we'll take a point for stimulating a public comment period on closed generic gTLDs. (<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13-en.htm" target="_blank">link</a>) The BC doesn't have a position for/against closed generics, but we
have been pressing ICANN to clarify how a registry can qualify for a Code of Conduct exception to allow ownership of all domain names and bypass use of all registrars. </div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
More to come as we craft our BC comments on these changes. </div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Meanwhile, congratulations on 4 hard-won points for the BC team.</div>
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- </div>
<div>Steve DelBianco</div>
<div>Executive Director</div>
<div>NetChoice</div>
<div><a href="http://www.NetChoice.org" target="_blank">http://www.NetChoice.org</a> and <a href="http://blog.netchoice.org" target="_blank">http://blog.netchoice.org</a> </div>
<div><a href="tel:%2B1.202.420.7482" value="+12024207482" target="_blank">+1.202.420.7482</a> </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>