<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div>
<div>On the 22-May BC member call we discussed final changes to the BC comment draft, to address whether registrars would be obligated to sign an updated RAA. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Anjali Hansen and Elisa Cooper updated the draft with this paragraph (on page 2):</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<div>Section 5.3 -- “Right to Substitute Updated Agreement” -- provides for the possibility that ICANN will enter into a revised “form Registrar accreditation agreement” into which a registrar could “elect” to enter. The procedure for updating the RAA appears
to be on a different track from the amendment process and the BC requests more information on this process and wishes to understand the repercussions of having some registrars elect to enter into a new agreement while others might elect to stay with the current
accreditation agreement. </div>
<div> </div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<div>Please do your final review by 30-May-2013 so that we can submit to ICANN. Any objections or edits should be sent as Reply to All. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks again to Anjali Hansen, Elisa Cooper, Susan Kawaguchi, and others for work on this draft.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>--Steve</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Optima; font-size:10pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Steve DelBianco <<a href="mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org">sdelbianco@netchoice.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:45 AM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org">bc-gnso@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org">bc-gnso@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"Hansen, Anjali" <<a href="mailto:AHansen@council.bbb.org">AHansen@council.bbb.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on proposed final 2013 RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement)<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; ">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div>ICANN has posted the proposed final 2013 RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement) for public comment. (<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-22apr13-en.htm">link</a>) </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Anjali Hansen admirably volunteered to draft BC comments. Several BC members provided input, including Ron Andruff, Bill Smith, Susan Kawaguchi, Zahid Jamil, and Elisa Cooper. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We held a conference call on this topic on 2-May where many others provided ideas. (<a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31162833/Minutes+BC+Members+call+MAY+02+2013.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1368100389000 ">call minutes</a> and <a href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31162833/BC+MAY+02+2013.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1368100411000">Transcript</a> )</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Still, Anjali shows several pending questions in the attached draft. We need further help from BC members with direct experience dealing with registrars and privacy/proxy providers.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Comment period closes 4-Jun. That allows our regular 14-day review and approval period. So, please REPLY ALL with your suggested edits and comments regarding this draft, before 28-May-2013.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div>Steve DelBianco</div>
<div>Vice chair for policy coordination</div>
<div>Business Constituency</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium; ">
<div style="border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: rgb(181, 196, 223); border-top-width: 1pt; padding-top: 3pt; padding-right: 0in; padding-bottom: 0in; padding-left: 0in; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; ">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; "> <a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Steve DelBianco<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, April 08, 2013 2:54 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'bc - GNSO list'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [bc-gnso] Notes from Monday 8-April Beijing session on new RAA<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="font-size: medium; ">
<div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">ICANN staff just spent an hour answering BC questions about the new RAA (registrar Accreditation Agreement).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">The main element of controversy is the process for ICANN to amend the RAA. On 2-April, ICANN proposed a new amendment process (<a href="http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-proposed-amendment-process-02apr13-en.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">link</a>)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">The notes below may be helpful for volunteers Anjali Hansen and Zahid Jamil, who volunteered last week to draft BC comments on the new RAA.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Law enforcement items were first priority for negotiation. ICANN says the LEA items are agreed by registrars, so ICANN added a dozen “new asks”, incl: </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 30pt; margin-right: 0in; ">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">- EBERO, Registrant Rights, data escrow, abuse contact, </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">- obligations for registrars using Resellers, </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">- greater compliance tools, incl provision that “pattern or practice of cybersquatting” is grounds for termination )</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Made progress on privacy /proxy services (P/P) since Toronto. Temporary P/P specification while ICANN develops accreditation program. In response to a compliance question, Samantha said the P/P Spec sets
high level principles that are actually easy to enforce. At my request, Susan Kawaguchi is drafting BC comment on just this specification since she has significant experience with P/P issues.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">I asked about delay to the P/P accreditation in light of the Expert Group on Directory Services. Samantha said that Registrars truly want ICANN to do a P/P accreditation program so it would apply to all P/P
providers – not just those affiliated with Registrars who have to sign the RAA.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">RAA will be a model document, so its not subject to negotiation with each registrar (except for bilateral amendments). So negotiations won’t be a bottleneck for getting registrars on-board.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">I asked whether the RAA needed exceptions for registrars created just to service a dot-brand gTLD. (single registrant, single-user) Such as transition on termination; Rights to data; transfers, etc. Staff
and BC members could not come up with concerns that would call for exceptions.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Public comment would be valuable in these areas: </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 30pt; margin-right: 0in; ">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Registrant rights & responsibilities. This was drafted by registrars.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Validation of registrant data (registrant and account holder?)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Penalties for inaccurate data</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Registrars want to drop Port 43 access for thick registries</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Unilateral amendment by ICANN. See Cyrus blog on 2-Apr</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Ron Andruff asked if the next iteration of the RAA will be posted for public comment. Answer was not definitive, so I asked Ron to draft a couple paragraphs of rationale for BC comments. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; ">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; ">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>