<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>Microsoft Word - GAC Dublin 54 Communique.docx</title>
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Just published, <a href="https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee?preview=/27132037/40632498/GAC%20Dublin%2054%20Communique.pdf">
here</a> and key exceprts shown below:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 5">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700; background-color: rgb(55.294120%, 70.196080%, 88.627450%)">V. Transition of US Stewardship of IANA and Enhancing ICANN Accountability
</span></p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">1. IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC took note of the activities being carried out by the ICG, and thanked the GAC Representatives in the ICG for their efforts.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">2. Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG- Accountability)
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC recognizes that much progress has been made by the CCWG-Accountability in its ongoing work, and welcomes the CCWG’s achievements to date and supports the efforts to finalise its proposal
for enhancing ICANN accountability as required for the IANA stewardship transition.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">In assessing the specific accountability recommendations put forth so far by the CCWG- Accountability, the GAC considers that whatever the final outcome of this process may be, the new accountability
framework to be agreed upon must preserve the current role of governments in ICANN.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);">The discussions on Stress Test 18 have helped the GAC to have a better understanding of the different views on the issue. In assessing the different rationales presented
so far related to Stress Test 18, the GAC considered: </span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Symbol'">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The need that each and every Advisory Committee ensures that the advice provided is clear and reflects the consensus view of the Committee;
</span></p>
</li><li style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Symbol'">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The need that each and every Advisory Committee should preserve its own autonomy in its definition of consensus;
</span></p>
</li><li style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Symbol'">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The value the Board attributes to receiving consensus advice;
</span></p>
</li><li style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Symbol'">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The recommendation of the BGRI WG, as reiterated by the ATRT2, to set the threshold </span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;">for the ICANN Board to reject GAC advice to a 2/3
majority voting, consistent with the threshold established for rejection of ccNSO and GNSO PDP recommendations.</span></p>
</li></ul>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
<div class="page" title="Page 6">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
<div class="layoutArea">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
<div class="column">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);">In view of the above, having considered concerns expressed by various parties, the GAC agreed to further work on the issue of Stress Test 18, and to submit any further
input to the CCWG taking into account the timelines of the CCWG. GAC Members will continue to work within the CCWG to finalise the proposal for enhancing ICANN accountability.
</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700; background-color: rgb(55.294120%, 70.196080%, 88.627450%)">VI. Other GAC Discussions
</span></p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">1. Dot Africa
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC has reviewed the letter of 28 September 2015 from the Board Chair to the GAC Chair concerning the DotConnectAfrica Trust (DCA) v. ICANN Independent Review Process; and will be responding
in writing in the near future. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">2. Three-Character Country Codes as TLDs in Future Rounds
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC has received a request from the Cross Community Working Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names as Top Level Domains for GAC input on the issue of possible use of 3-character country
codes as TLDs in future rounds. The GAC is considering its response to this request and will liaise with the Working Group inter-sessionally. Several GAC members have indicated possible areas of concern and these will be discussed further within GAC and with
the Working Group. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700; background-color: rgb(55.294120%, 70.196080%, 88.627450%)">VII. GAC Advice to the ICANN Board</span><span style="font-size: 8.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700; background-color: rgb(55.294120%, 70.196080%, 88.627450%); vertical-align: 6.000000pt">2
</span></p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">1. gTLD Safeguards : Current Round
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">Consistent with its Buenos Aires Communiqué, the GAC is seeking a clear record of the ICANN Board’s acceptance or rejection of GAC Safeguard Advice. This would optimally be provided in the form
of a scorecard that includes a) what elements of GAC advice have been implemented; b) what remains a work in progress; and c) what has not been accepted for implementation, with a clear rationale for not being accepted.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC reiterates its advice that the New gTLD Program Committee create a list of commended Public Interest Commitment (PIC) examples related to verification and validation of credentials for
domains in highly regulated sectors to serve as a model of best practices for gTLD registry operators. Such a compendium would also permit an assessment of the success of the PIC specifications for strings representing highly regulated sectors, and will also
facilitate the incorporation of such safeguards into contracts in future new gTLD rounds.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">In light of the current and upcoming reviews of the New gTLD program,
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">a. The GAC advises and urges the Board to:</span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 7">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">develop and adopt a harmonized methodology for reporting to the ICANN community the levels and persistence of abusive conduct (e.g., malware, botnets, phishing, pharming, piracy, trademark and/or
copyright infringement, counterfeiting, fraudulent or deceptive practices and other illegal conduct) that have occurred in the rollout of the new gTLD program.
</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="layoutArea">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
<div class="column">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC was informed that independent studies presented during the ICANN 54 meeting on the review of the New gTLD round show a relatively low level of trust in these gTLDs by consumers compared
to existing TLDs. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">2. Future gTLD Rounds<br>
The GAC advises the Board that: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">before defining the modalities for future rounds, a rigorous assessment of all public policy related aspects of the current round should be undertaken, taking into account the advice given by the
GAC on this subject since the beginning of the New gTLD process, including advice relating to community-wide engagement on the issues of communication to and access by developing countries and regions; and advice regarding past policy decisions taken by the
Board to reserve the Red Cross and Red Crescent designations and names. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">In this regard, the GAC expects that those elements of the current framework for new gTLDs that are considered appropriate by the GAC will remain and that the elements that are not considered satisfactory
will be improved for subsequent rounds. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">3. Protection for IGOs<br>
The GAC advises the Board to: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;"> facilitate the timely conclusion of discussions of the “small group” and the NGPC in an effort to resolve the issue of IGO protections.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">4. Community Priority Evaluation<br>
a. The GAC advises the Board that: </span></p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;">the GAC reiterates previously expressed concerns that the </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">Community Priority Evaluation (CPE)
process has not met the </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">expectations of applicants and notes that
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri;">all the successful </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">applications are
</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri;">currently </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri; color: rgb(34, 34, 34);">the subject of dispute resolution </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;">procedures;</span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; color: rgb(13.333330%, 13.333330%, 13.333330%)">the GAC expects the current specific problems faced by </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;">individual
applicants to be resolved without any unreasonable </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;">delay, and in a manner in which justified community interests </span><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Calibri; font-size: 12pt;">are
best served;</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<div class="page" title="Page 8">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">iii. the GAC notes possibly unforeseen consequences for community applicants of recourse by competing applicants to other accountability mechanisms; and the specific challenges faced by some community
applicants in auctions when in competition with commercial applicants; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">5. Use of 2-letter Country Codes and Country Names at the Second Level
</span></p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">The GAC notes that the process for considering comments for two-character letter/letter labels launched on the 6</span><span style="font-size: 8.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; vertical-align: 6.000000pt">th
</span><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">October 2015 is not consistent with GAC advice which recommended that governments ́ comments be fully considered. That advice was accepted by Board resolution 2015.02.12.16.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">GAC Members have now been asked to clarify which specific TLDs their comments pertain to, and to explain how the release of the two-letter label will cause confusion with their corresponding country
code. The GAC reiterates its advice on this issue and </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">a. advises the Board that:
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">comments submitted by the relevant Governments be fully considered regardless of the grounds for objection.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">b. The GAC further advises the Board to:
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">be mindful of governments ́ capacity limitations and asks the Board to facilitate simplification of the process for providing comments to address their concerns.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'; font-weight: 700">c. With respect to new requests for release, the GAC advises the Board to:
</span></p>
<ol style="list-style-type: lower-roman">
<li style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">task ICANN to work with the GAC Secretariat to address the technical issues with comment forms and in the interim
</span></p>
</li><li style="font-size: 12.000000pt; font-family: 'Calibri'">
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">offer alternative means for comments. </span></p>
</li></ol>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;"></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none; padding:0px;">
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<div id="MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>