[bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Mathieu 
Tks
That also would be helpful
Kavouss


Sent from my iPhone

> On 4 Apr 2016, at 13:47, Mathieu Weill via bylaws-coord <bylaws-coord at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Understood Holly.
> 
> We’ll make that very clear to the respective groups. I am trying to find
> ways to make this outstanding effort happen and meet the deadlines, while
> ensuring that the review by our groups are effective and well informed.
> 
> I agree with Andrew that the top priority for CCWG and CWG legal is to
> take this step back and review the documents, in order to be in a position
> to certify compliance with the recommendations.
> 
> Maybe Icann Legal could attempt to provide the table of correspondence ?
> The point of such a table is not to to validate it, but help colleagues
> from the respective groups, who are looking for specific aspects of the
> Bylaws (such as the implementation of Rec 11, or the implementation of the
> separation process), locate the respective sections of the Bylaws. This
> type of table was discussed during the Board - leadership teams dinner in
> Marrakech and confirmed, to the CCWG at least, during its Thursday
> meeting.
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
> Best
> Mathieu
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Andrew Sullivan [mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 4 avril 2016 13:26
> À : Gregory, Holly
> Cc : Rosemary E. Fei; 'Mathieu Weill'; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley
> ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran
> Objet : Re: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:21:22AM +0000, Gregory, Holly via bylaws-coord
> wrote:
>> I do not recall a promise for such a document but our very tired team
> will try to produce it in the next several days.
> 
> I confess I don't understand the need for such a document.  If we get it,
> in order to use it we'd have to validate it.  We don't actually have time
> to do that collectively as a separate step, and to do it we'd end up doing
> the same work as just going through the recommendations ourselves.
> 
> Moreover, I'm not at all sure that as a matter of prioritisation the
> lawyers should turn their focus from validating the text themselves.
> That is an urgent and necessary task, and must take priority.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> bylaws-coord mailing list
> bylaws-coord at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord