[bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline

[Gregory, Holly]

We have discussed internally and can have this chart prepared by Sidley for the group tomorrow.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)

________________________________
From: Gregory, Holly
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 06:59:20 AM
To: Mathieu Weill; Andrew Sullivan
Cc: Rosemary E. Fei; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran; Samantha Eisner; John Jeffrey
Subject: RE: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline

For the CCWG proposal we have a chart that has the key substance of the proposal in the left hand column and in the right hand column our notes on the ICANN Legal/Jones Day draft provided two weeks ago.  We could easily strip out those notes so the chart could be used to map the CCWG proposal to the current draft bylaws.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)

________________________________
From: Mathieu Weill
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 06:47:30 AM
To: Andrew Sullivan; Gregory, Holly
Cc: Rosemary E. Fei; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran
Subject: RE: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline

Understood Holly.

We’ll make that very clear to the respective groups. I am trying to find
ways to make this outstanding effort happen and meet the deadlines, while
ensuring that the review by our groups are effective and well informed.

I agree with Andrew that the top priority for CCWG and CWG legal is to
take this step back and review the documents, in order to be in a position
to certify compliance with the recommendations.

Maybe Icann Legal could attempt to provide the table of correspondence ?
The point of such a table is not to to validate it, but help colleagues
from the respective groups, who are looking for specific aspects of the
Bylaws (such as the implementation of Rec 11, or the implementation of the
separation process), locate the respective sections of the Bylaws. This
type of table was discussed during the Board - leadership teams dinner in
Marrakech and confirmed, to the CCWG at least, during its Thursday
meeting.

I hope this helps.

Best
Mathieu

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Andrew Sullivan [mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com]
Envoyé : lundi 4 avril 2016 13:26
À : Gregory, Holly
Cc : Rosemary E. Fei; 'Mathieu Weill'; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley
ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran
Objet : Re: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline

Dear colleagues,

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:21:22AM +0000, Gregory, Holly via bylaws-coord
wrote:
>  I do not recall a promise for such a document but our very tired team
will try to produce it in the next several days.

I confess I don't understand the need for such a document.  If we get it,
in order to use it we'd have to validate it.  We don't actually have time
to do that collectively as a separate step, and to do it we'd end up doing
the same work as just going through the recommendations ourselves.

Moreover, I'm not at all sure that as a matter of prioritisation the
lawyers should turn their focus from validating the text themselves.
That is an urgent and necessary task, and must take priority.

Best regards,

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com



****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160404/9c1b1e32/attachment-0001.html>