[bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline

Erika Mann erika at erikamann.com
Mon Apr 4 14:16:45 UTC 2016


Thanks a million. I forwarded this exchange to Amy and John from ICANN''s
legal team. Like you, they are overworked and might miss crucial parts of
this exchange.

Thanks,
Erika

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Gregory, Holly via bylaws-coord <
bylaws-coord at icann.org> wrote:

> We have discussed internally and can have this chart prepared by Sidley
> for the group tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Gregory, Holly
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 06:59:20 AM
> *To:* Mathieu Weill; Andrew Sullivan
> *Cc:* Rosemary E. Fei; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley ICANN CCWG;
> ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran; Samantha Eisner; John Jeffrey
>
> *Subject:* RE: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline
>
> For the CCWG proposal we have a chart that has the key substance of the
> proposal in the left hand column and in the right hand column our notes on
> the ICANN Legal/Jones Day draft provided two weeks ago.  We could easily
> strip out those notes so the chart could be used to map the CCWG proposal
> to the current draft bylaws.
>
>
>
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Mathieu Weill
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 06:47:30 AM
> *To:* Andrew Sullivan; Gregory, Holly
> *Cc:* Rosemary E. Fei; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley ICANN CCWG;
> ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran
> *Subject:* RE: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline
>
> Understood Holly.
>
> We’ll make that very clear to the respective groups. I am trying to find
> ways to make this outstanding effort happen and meet the deadlines, while
> ensuring that the review by our groups are effective and well informed.
>
> I agree with Andrew that the top priority for CCWG and CWG legal is to
> take this step back and review the documents, in order to be in a position
> to certify compliance with the recommendations.
>
> Maybe Icann Legal could attempt to provide the table of correspondence ?
> The point of such a table is not to to validate it, but help colleagues
> from the respective groups, who are looking for specific aspects of the
> Bylaws (such as the implementation of Rec 11, or the implementation of the
> separation process), locate the respective sections of the Bylaws. This
> type of table was discussed during the Board - leadership teams dinner in
> Marrakech and confirmed, to the CCWG at least, during its Thursday
> meeting.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Best
> Mathieu
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Andrew Sullivan [mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>]
> Envoyé : lundi 4 avril 2016 13:26
> À : Gregory, Holly
> Cc : Rosemary E. Fei; 'Mathieu Weill'; bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley
> ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Amy Stathos; Daniel Halloran
> Objet : Re: [bylaws-coord] Bylaws redline
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:21:22AM +0000, Gregory, Holly via bylaws-coord
> wrote:
> >  I do not recall a promise for such a document but our very tired team
> will try to produce it in the next several days.
>
> I confess I don't understand the need for such a document.  If we get it,
> in order to use it we'd have to validate it.  We don't actually have time
> to do that collectively as a separate step, and to do it we'd end up doing
> the same work as just going through the recommendations ourselves.
>
> Moreover, I'm not at all sure that as a matter of prioritisation the
> lawyers should turn their focus from validating the text themselves.
> That is an urgent and necessary task, and must take priority.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> bylaws-coord mailing list
> bylaws-coord at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160404/1a9f9dd3/attachment.html>


More information about the bylaws-coord mailing list