[bylaws-coord] Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Wed Apr 20 02:00:22 UTC 2016

Dear Co-Chairs:

After conferring with Holly, we are requesting that you consider moving the April 26 call currently scheduled for 19:00 UTC so that I can attend.  Times close to that which will work for both of us are, unfortunately, quite limited, and inconsiderate for some parts of the globe, but we thought this call required both our presence.  We are both available for a call that starts at 11 PM or midnight Eastern US time, on April 25, 26, or 27.  I believe that means 3:00 or 4:00 UTC on April 26, 27, or 28, although you will want to confirm I have done the conversion properly.

Rosemary

From: Rosemary E. Fei
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 3:11 AM
To: 'Mathieu Weill'; Holly Gregory
Cc: ICANN-Adler; Sidley ICANN CCWG; john.jeffrey at icann.org; Samantha.Eisner at icann.org; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; acct-staff at icann.org
Subject: RE: Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Dear Co-Chairs:

I am, unfortunately, unavailable to attend a call at all on April 26.  I could have someone else from the Adler team attend.

I defer to Holly regarding the level of detail of our confirmation.

Rosemary

From: Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 12:51 AM
To: Holly Gregory
Cc: Rosemary E. Fei; ICANN-Adler; Sidley ICANN CCWG; john.jeffrey at icann.org<mailto:john.jeffrey at icann.org>; Samantha.Eisner at icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; acct-staff at icann.org<mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>
Subject: RE: Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Thanks Holly,

That is understood on my side, and as I wrote in a previous email, it is important to manage expectations.

I guess many in our group would be satisfied with a statement from you that would, recommendation by recommendation, confirm that the Bylaws adequately address the Supplemental Report and appear compliant with the California Code.

Is that what you have in mind ?

We will also need you to be available on the Apr 26 call, to respond to any questions regarding your statement.

Best
Mathieu

De : Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com]
Envoyé : mardi 19 avril 2016 04:40
À : 'Mathieu Weill'
Cc : Rosemary E. Fei (rfei at adlercolvin.com<mailto:rfei at adlercolvin.com>); ICANN at adlercolvin.com<mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>; Sidley ICANN CCWG; (john.jeffrey at icann.org<mailto:john.jeffrey at icann.org>); Samantha.Eisner at icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>
Objet : Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Mathieu,
Just to clarify, we will be providing within 2 days of the release of the draft a statement confirming that the bylaw draft conforms to the proposal.  We will not be providing a detailed memo.  We would need far more time for that.
HOLLY J. GREGORY
Partner and Co-Chair
Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group
Sidley Austin LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
+1 212 839 5853
holly.gregory at sidley.com<mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>
www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com/>
[Description : Image supprimée par l'expéditeur. http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]<http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu Weill
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 3:29 AM
To: Seun Ojedeji; accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Seun, All,

Apologies for the delay in responding. Following an exchange with the Bylaws coordination group, the latest update on milestones is as follows :

-        A new Bylaw draft should be produced by lawyers and circulated to the Bylaws coordination group by tomorrow (Tuesday 19th)

-        Our legal team should be able to produce a memo to confirm compliance with our report within 48 hours from that date

-        The CCWG discussion / approval based on these inputs would therefore take place during the public comment period which is expected to start on Apr 20th.

I hope this is helpful.

Best
Mathieu

De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Seun Ojedeji
Envoyé : mercredi 13 avril 2016 10:11
À : accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Dear Co-Chairs,

I understand that the goal of this process is ONLY supposed to reflect update to the bylaw that has been proposed in our report. Inview of this, I like to ask 2 questions:

1. During one of our previous call, I specifically asked when is it that the lawyers will come back with a certified bylaw draft. You indicated that you will get back to me and since I have not seen an update on that, I like to know the status? And also like to know if this delay would imply update on the timeline as I don't think the timeline is at all feasible again

2. I will like to ask that apart from the lawyers confirming that the bylaw is consistent with our proposal, that it also be confirmed that NO other update/changes has been done on the bylaw apart from those related to this transition as reflected in the respective proposals.

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160420/a8fa947f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160420/a8fa947f/image001-0001.jpg>