[bylaws-coord] Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs

Wed Apr 20 07:12:47 UTC 2016

Dear All,
I will be on Mission from 26 evening ( Central European time) till 03 May
12,00UTC
I will not be in a position to attend 26 April 19,00 UTS but could attend
04,00 UTSC on that date
Regards
Kavouss

2016-04-20 4:00 GMT+02:00 Rosemary E. Fei <rfei at adlercolvin.com>:

> Dear Co-Chairs:
>
>
>
> After conferring with Holly, we are requesting that you consider moving
> the April 26 call currently scheduled for 19:00 UTC so that I can attend.
> Times close to that which will work for both of us are, unfortunately,
> quite limited, and inconsiderate for some parts of the globe, but we
> thought this call required both our presence.  We are both available for a
> call that starts at 11 PM or midnight Eastern US time, on April 25, 26, or
> 27.  I believe that means 3:00 or 4:00 UTC on April 26, 27, or 28, although
> you will want to confirm I have done the conversion properly.
>
>
>
> Rosemary
>
>
>
> *From:* Rosemary E. Fei
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2016 3:11 AM
> *To:* 'Mathieu Weill'; Holly Gregory
> *Cc:* ICANN-Adler; Sidley ICANN CCWG; john.jeffrey at icann.org;
> Samantha.Eisner at icann.org; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía;
> acct-staff at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs
>
>
>
> Dear Co-Chairs:
>
>
>
> I am, unfortunately, unavailable to attend a call at all on April 26.  I
> could have someone else from the Adler team attend.
>
>
>
> I defer to Holly regarding the level of detail of our confirmation.
>
>
>
> Rosemary
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2016 12:51 AM
> *To:* Holly Gregory
> *Cc:* Rosemary E. Fei; ICANN-Adler; Sidley ICANN CCWG;
> john.jeffrey at icann.org; Samantha.Eisner at icann.org; Thomas Rickert; León
> Felipe Sánchez Ambía; acct-staff at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs
>
>
>
> Thanks Holly,
>
>
>
> That is understood on my side, and as I wrote in a previous email, it is
> important to manage expectations.
>
>
>
> I guess many in our group would be satisfied with a statement from you
> that would, recommendation by recommendation, confirm that the Bylaws
> adequately address the Supplemental Report and appear compliant with the
> California Code.
>
>
>
> Is that what you have in mind ?
>
>
>
> We will also need you to be available on the Apr 26 call, to respond to
> any questions regarding your statement.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> *De :* Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com
> <holly.gregory at sidley.com>]
> *Envoyé :* mardi 19 avril 2016 04:40
> *À :* 'Mathieu Weill'
> *Cc :* Rosemary E. Fei (rfei at adlercolvin.com); ICANN at adlercolvin.com;
> Sidley ICANN CCWG; (john.jeffrey at icann.org); Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
> *Objet :* Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
> Mathieu,
>
> Just to clarify, we will be providing within 2 days of the release of the
> draft a statement confirming that the bylaw draft conforms to the
> proposal.  We will not be providing a detailed memo.  We would need far
> more time for that.
>
> *HOLLY* *J. GREGORY*
> Partner and Co-Chair
> Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group
>
> *Sidley Austin LLP*
> 787 Seventh Avenue
> New York, NY 10019
> +1 212 839 5853
> holly.gregory at sidley.com
> www.sidley.com
>
> [image: Description : Image supprimée par l'expéditeur.
> http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]
> <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mathieu
> Weill
> *Sent:* Monday, April 18, 2016 3:29 AM
> *To:* Seun Ojedeji; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs
>
>
>
> Seun, All,
>
>
>
> Apologies for the delay in responding. Following an exchange with the
> Bylaws coordination group, the latest update on milestones is as follows :
>
>
>
> -        A new Bylaw draft should be produced by lawyers and circulated
> to the Bylaws coordination group by tomorrow (Tuesday 19th)
>
> -        Our legal team should be able to produce a memo to confirm
> compliance with our report within 48 hours from that date
>
> -        The CCWG discussion / approval based on these inputs would
> therefore take place during the public comment period which is expected to
> start on Apr 20th.
>
>
>
> I hope this is helpful.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> *De :* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] *De la part de* Seun
> Ojedeji
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 13 avril 2016 10:11
> *À :* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Objet :* [CCWG-ACCT] Question to lawyers/Co-Chairs
>
>
>
> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> I understand that the goal of this process is ONLY supposed to reflect
> update to the bylaw that has been proposed in our report. Inview of this, I
> like to ask 2 questions:
>
> 1. During one of our previous call, I specifically asked when is it that
> the lawyers will come back with a certified bylaw draft. You indicated that
> you will get back to me and since I have not seen an update on that, I like
> to know the status? And also like to know if this delay would imply update
> on the timeline as I don't think the timeline is at all feasible again
>
> 2. I will like to ask that apart from the lawyers confirming that the
> bylaw is consistent with our proposal, that it also be confirmed that NO
> other update/changes has been done on the bylaw apart from those related to
> this transition as reflected in the respective proposals.
>
> Regards
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> bylaws-coord mailing list
> bylaws-coord at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160420/0c9b21ee/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160420/0c9b21ee/image001-0001.jpg>