[bylaws-coord] Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

[Mathieu Weill]

Thank you Holly,



I do not recall that we mentioned we would change direction on this issue 
during the call ? Maybe I missed something ? If needed, we can forward your 
note on this, but I don’t want to reopen a discussion if it’s closed and 
consistent with our previous direction, so I’d appreciate if other 
participants in the call could offer their view of where we landed on this.



Best

Mathieu



De : Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2016 00:39
À : Thomas Rickert; Mathieu Weill; bylaws-coord at icann.org; León Felipe 
Sánchez Ambía
Cc : Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Samantha Eisner
Objet : RE: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context



I inadvertently omitted Leon on my first email.  My apologies.



Sent with Good (www.good.com)



  _____

From: Gregory, Holly
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 04:58:00 PM
To: Thomas Rickert; Mathieu Weill; bylaws-coord at icann.org
Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Samantha Eisner
Subject: FW: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

Please see note below which I had Rebecca draft on my behalf as I ran to 
airplane.  Please post to CCWG list serve.

We followed the instructions regarding the certified issue below as 
specifically directed. We would ask that this fact be included in your 
comment letter if the direction is now being changed.  Kind regards, Holly



Sent with Good (www.good.com)



  _____

From: Grapsas, Rebecca
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 04:48:56 PM
To: Gregory, Holly
Subject: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

Dear Co-Chairs,

Further to Brett Schaefer’s comment raised on today’s CCWG call regarding 
the availability of interim relief in the context of a Request for 
Reconsideration, this question was previously certified to the CCWG.  In its 
responses to questions dated April 12, the CCWG indicated that interim 
relief taking the form of a stay/suspension would not apply to 
Reconsideration (pasted below and attached).

Extract from Draft Answers to CCWG Questions for Bylaws Coordination Group, 
12 April 2016:



20. Article 4 ACCOUNTABILITY AND REVIEW



Article 4 and Appendix D Article 4 do not specify if, after a Requestor or 
the EC requests review or reconsideration, the decision is suspended pending 
resolution. This would seem to be necessary to prevent irreversible harm.



CCWG Response 11 April:



·        Can apply to IRP if requested, not applicable to Reconsideration.



Best regards,

Holly



HOLLY J. GREGORY
Partner and Co-Chair
Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group

Sidley Austin LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
+1 212 839 5853
holly.gregory at sidley.com
 <http://www.sidley.com/> www.sidley.com







****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is 
privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any 
attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160504/0c2bf30c/attachment.html>