[bylaws-coord] Guidance Requested

[Jordan Carter]

Hi Holly

30 works.

Cheers
Jordan

On Monday, 23 May 2016, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com> wrote:

> From a practical perspective is 30 days preferable to allow for the
> flexibility for noticed etc that you mention?
>
>
>
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jordan Carter
> *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2016 04:43:08 AM
> *To:* Gregory, Holly
> *Cc:* bylaws-coord at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bylaws-coord at icann.org');>;
> ICANN at adlercolvin.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ICANN at adlercolvin.com');>; Sidley ICANN CCWG
> *Subject:* Re: [bylaws-coord] Guidance Requested
>
> Hi all
>
> This delay is a new process, required to give time for the 28-day petition
> process to occur once the board passes a standard bylaws amendment.  The
> logic is it would be more disruption to Icann to 'roll back' an amendment
> which was being challenged than to defer its start.
>
> My view is that it isn't important which of 28 or 30 days is chosen. The
> longer period gives a little flexibility for e.g. notices or info to flow.
> 28 will also work.
>
> On instinct I'd stick with the 28 which is the maximum length of
> petitions.
>
> Cheers
> Jordan
>
> On Saturday, 21 May 2016, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','holly.gregory at sidley.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Dear Bylaws Coordinating Group:
>>
>>
>>
>> We have sent proposed edits corresponding to most of the CCWG Comments of
>> May 13 as well as proposed corrections of typos and conforming changes to
>> Sam Eisner and we have copied you on that email.
>>
>>
>>
>> There is one item on which we need guidance from the Bylaws Coordinating
>> Group or the CCWG relating to Section 25.1(e):  The CCWG Proposal is
>> internally inconsistent on when Standard Bylaw Amendments take effect.
>> Annex 2, Paragraph 30 provides for a 28 day period, and Annex 4, Paragraph
>> 32 provides for a 30 day period in both instances following the Rejection
>> Action Board Notification Date.  We need direction on which time period
>> should be used – 28 days or 30 days.
>>
>>
>>
>> We leave it to you whether this email or the email to Sam sent today
>> should be posted to the CCWG list.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Holly and Rosemary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *HOLLY* *J. GREGORY*
>> Partner and Co-Chair
>> Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group
>>
>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>> 787 Seventh Avenue
>> New York, NY 10019
>> +1 212 839 5853
>> holly.gregory at sidley.com
>> www.sidley.com
>>
>> [image: http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]
>> <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
>> privileged or confidential.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
>> attachments and notify us
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>
>
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
> Chief Executive, InternetNZ
>
> +64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>
>
> Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
>
>

-- 
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive, InternetNZ

+64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160524/ef73b7a2/attachment.html>