[Capacity-Building-WG] draft survey

Fri May 24 07:39:18 UTC 2013

Some time make a survey is with only proposit to legalize a determinate situation. Im particularly against surveys I prefer a good open discution and for a enough time to reach a litle consensus. Survey is a tool not transparent for all and the results depend on who read the answers and what be his/her intetpretatíon. Many times the reponse is only one cross over very important issues wich need to be discussed. My two cents from my vacations,  on Morocco.

Carlos Dionisio Aguirre.

Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 17:17:39 
To: <DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca>
Cc: <capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Capacity-Building-WG] draft survey

I understand what Tijani and Darlene have said, but when the survey was done in 2010, only 72 out of 122 ALSes responded. So there is a large gap of ALSes that haven't filled out the first set of questions in 2010.

So a possible approach could be that those ALSes that never responded to the first survey, ask them the questions 1,4,5,6 in a separate survey and then a survey for all ALSes on the capacity building related issues. 

Dev Anand 

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Thompson, Darlene <DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca <mailto:DThompson1 at gov.nu.ca> > wrote:
 I agree with Tijani.  People get tired of seeing the same old questions time and again so if we can collect this information from previous surveys, lets shorten it.

 D

 Darlene A. Thompson
 CAP Administrator
 N-CAP/Department of Education
 P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
 Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
 Phone:  (867) 975-5631 <tel:%28867%29%20975-5631> 
 Fax:  (867) 975-5610 <tel:%28867%29%20975-5610> 
 dthompson at gov.nu.ca <mailto:dthompson at gov.nu.ca> 
 ________________________________________
 From: capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>  [capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] on behalf of Tijani BEN JEMAA [tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn> ]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 4:27 AM
 To: 'Oksana Prykhodko'; 'At-Large Capacity Building WG'
 Subject: Re: [Capacity-Building-WG] draft survey

 Hi Oksana,

 Thank you for your proposal.

 I think that at least parts 1,4,5 and 6 were in the survey performed a few years ago (I think in 2011); Dev can tell you. So, I believe we can have these information from there.

 The shortest and the simplest is the survey, the best it is conducted. It's better to have less questions to encourage the ALSes to answer them.

 Have a nice day

 My address tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org>  is not working properly any more. Please use one of the 2 following addresses: tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>  or tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn> 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Tijani BEN JEMAA
 Executive Director
 Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
 Phone:  + 216 41 649 605 <tel:%2B%20216%2041%20649%20605> 
 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 <tel:%2B%20216%2098%20330%20114> 
 Fax:       + 216 70 853 376 <tel:%2B%20216%2070%20853%20376> 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 -----Message d'origine-----
 De : capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>  [mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] De la part de Oksana Prykhodko
 Envoyé : lundi 20 mai 2013 19:17
 À : At-Large Capacity Building WG
 Objet : [Capacity-Building-WG] draft survey

Survey

 1. ALS details

 1.1. Date of registration.

 1.2. Date of joining At-Large.

 1.3. Number of members:

 - individual members;

 - organizational members.

 1.4. Level of representation of ALS:

 - international;

 - national;

 - regional;

 - state (?);

 - local. (table)

 1.4. Web-site.

 1.5. Contact details (?).

 2. Level of expertize

 2.1. Core mission (we can segregate it into different strings -

 technical, judicial and so on and put it into the table)

 2.2. In what sphere you can provide your expertise?

 2.3. Where you need the help?

 2.4. Your ALS members participation in Working Groups, regional or

 thematic events (IGF, TechDays and so on) - could you please provide

 us with details? (table)

 3. Level of cooperation

 3.1. Did you have experience of cooperation with other ALSes, with

 other ICANN constituencies from your country (ccNSO, GAC and so on),

 ISOC chapters? (table)

 3.2. Did you have experience of cooperation with parallel structures

 from other countries?

 3.3. Did you have experience of influence on governmental decisions

 within your country?

 3.4. Did you participate in working-out the decisions of regional

 structures regarding Internet Governance?

 3.5. Did you participate in WCIT process?

 4. Linguistic level

 4.1. Native/official/working language(s)

 4.2. Other languages - where you can help with translation and

 understanding, where you need help

 4.3. Usability of any on-line tools - could you please share your

 positive experience regarding using of different languages?

 4.4. Wiki-glossary in different languages

 5. Communication tools

 5.1. Does your ALS have own web-site? (table)

 - if yes, does it have interactive functions (forums, chat so on)?

 - if yes, does it have any information, that your ALS is the member of

 At-Large (logo, At-Large/RALO Bylaws etc.)?

 - if yes, is it in one language or in more than one?

 5.2. Do you have your ALS account in social media? If yes, please

 provide us any details (table).

 5.3. What other tools of communication do you use?

 6. Meetings of ALS members

 6.1. Does your ALS hold regular meetings with its members?

 6.2. If yes, how often?

 6.3. If yes, in what type (Face to face, teleconference, webinars,

 others)? (table)

 7. Integration into ICANN ecosystem (Questions 11-14 from previous survey)

 7.1. Scale of 1 to 5, how well is At-Large integrated in overall ICANN

 policy structure? (table)

 7.2. Scale of 1 to 5, how well your ALS integrated in the overall

 ALAC/RALO/ALS policy structure? (table)

 7.3. What are the most important limitations to ALS participation? (table)

 7.4. Which recommendation(s) does your ALS consider the most important

 to increasing its own participation in ICANN? (table)

 7.5. Which, if any, recommendation(s) would your ALS like to help the

 ALAC implement? (table)

 _______________________________________________

 capacity-building-wg mailing list

 capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 

 https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg

 _______________________________________________
 capacity-building-wg mailing list
 capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
 https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg