[cc-humanrights] Human Rights and ICANN - session description

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Niels,

Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such
conflict last time.

Rafik

2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
> > Hi Niels,
> >
>
> Hi Rafik,
>
> > I am not senior within ICANN
>
> Well, at least more senior than me ;)
>
> > but I guess I can help for this.
>
> That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday
> afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice.
> Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we
> could easily fill it).
>
> What do you people think?
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at
> > ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All
> > comments are very welcome.
> >
> > _________
> >
> > Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
> >
> > There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some
> > of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for
> > human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy.
> > While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it
> > would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether
> > our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human
> > rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for
> > addressing any incompatibilities.
> >
> > To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis.
> > This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a
> > process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
> >
> > ________
> >
> > What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to
> > send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN
> > meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the
> > ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Niels
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights
> >> mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUga5fAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpVdsIAIAEgJdwlFk+ee6DW1fjMlIZ
> AI2Qr7VgvaMyyzUep4w5taGYT+rGoijbEmLrBTZ55KVuHfi96zqa4r5ETfmAkgx0
> aSvp6OZUhA/BTP9OnOpnAlB1MCU7MC4hGZ+YMHAtGbvroknx5BHTsW1l7YbXDdyv
> O3qBAsmm34jQjaPNyNLOeLKoO+r9srU16/mIgJDM5LaYcM6jUnT2LaQQSXI2xEz1
> lu5UhjXyOooft62RVx0ChRzMXOppDdJs/w+qAkdna4U+3SCx6ADn9iHkoz9K9awC
> Wh+DZCIhenB1CYFo6qp19VJk9QNmYQ4a4sLEVK/cLvdeq5sRXzTekb5r41Dac/k=
> =LCHC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20141205/2560e899/attachment.html>