[cc-humanrights] Human Rights and ICANN - session description

Fri Dec 5 14:05:46 UTC 2014

Hi ,

I think we should see the different SO/AC  sessions ( we have also the CCWG
on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.

3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do
that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).

Rafik

2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>:

>  Hello all,
>
> it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because
> that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have
> staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the
> problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with
> the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled
> by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency
> day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might
> happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's
> GNSO wrap up.
> <sigh>
>
> Olivier
>
>
> On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
> > you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they
> think is more important.
> >
> > I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
> >
> > BD
> >
> >> On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org>
> <niels at article19.org> wrote:
> >>
>
> Hi Rafik,
>
> You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can
> we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
>
> I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour
> meeting, so let's go for that.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
>
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>
> On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >>> Hi Niels,
> >>>
> >>> Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had
> >>> such conflict last time.
> >>>
> >>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>> 2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org
> >>> <mailto:niels at article19.org> <niels at article19.org>>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
> >>>> Hi Niels,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rafik,
> >>>
> >>>> I am not senior within ICANN
> >>>
> >>> Well, at least more senior than me ;)
> >>>
> >>>> but I guess I can help for this.
> >>>
> >>> That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday
> >>> afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice.
> >>> Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we
> >>> could easily fill it).
> >>>
> >>> What do you people think?
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Niels
> >>>
> >>>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org
> >>>> <mailto:niels at article19.org> <niels at article19.org>> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>> It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at
> >>>> ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All
> >>>> comments are very welcome.
> >>>
> >>>> _________
> >>>
> >>>> Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
> >>>
> >>>> There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that
> >>>> some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications
> >>>> for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to
> >>>> privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such
> >>>> rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to
> >>>> assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally
> >>>> agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible
> >>>> methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
> >>>
> >>>> To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case
> >>>> basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for
> >>>> starting a process that could address them in a more systemic
> >>>> manner.
> >>>
> >>>> ________
> >>>
> >>>> What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy
> >>>> to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN
> >>>> meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the
> >>>> ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>>> Niels
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights
> >>>>> mailing listcc-humanrights at icann.org
> >>>>> <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org> <cc-humanrights at icann.org>
> >>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cc-humanrights mailing list
> >> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > William J. Drake
> > International Fellow & Lecturer
> >   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
> >   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> > Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
> >   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> > william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
> >   www.williamdrake.org
> > ***********************************************
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-humanrights mailing list
> > cc-humanrights at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
> >
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20141205/8076a57a/attachment-0001.html>