[cc-humanrights] Draft presentations GAC & Constituencies

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Tue Jun 23 13:02:50 UTC 2015



On 23-Jun-15 09:50, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks. 
>
> That is what I get for missing meetings: Making contents about issues

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------comments
> already resolved when reviewing materials to prep for a session..
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> On 23-Jun-15 09:38, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>> Hi Avri,
>>
>> The presentation is from the CCWP, as are the reports. Marilia said
>> after the GAC WG session that the Article19 logo on page 1 of the
>> presentation might be confusing, so I have removed it now.
>>
>> We talked about the status of the report during the last call and
>> agreed that we could publish this as a report by the CCWP yet because
>> of lack of time, therefore we made it an Article19 report with the
>> current title (Issue report to the CCWP). I hope that during the
>> working session we will be able to set out a process for the CCWP to
>> adopt this report.
>>
>> That is also the reason why no authors are mentioned to ensure that
>> there is no confusion. I would be more than happy to add all authors
>> and contributors when we can adopt the report as CCWP report (which
>> was the intention all along).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>
>> On 06/23/2015 09:22 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have question, is this from Article 19 or the WP?  Same for the
>>> report.
>>> I think that cross WP materials should perhaps list thanks at the
>>> end to those who paid for the work, but it makes me uncomfortable
>>> to see it used as if they are the ones creating the work.
>>> I also think that if any authors is listed, all of the
>>> authors/contributors should be listed.
>>> Just saying
>>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 21-Jun-15 15:18, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>> Thanks you Stephanie and the others that commented on the Skype
>>>> channel, please find the updated version attached.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Niels
>>>>
>>>> Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
>>>>
>>>> Article 19 www.article19.org
>>>>
>>>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D
>>>> 68E9
>>>>
>>>> On 06/21/2015 01:33 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>>>> Since it is PDFed, I cannot edit.  Here are my Comments: 1.  ON
>>>>> the title page it would be great if you could identify
>>>>> yourself as NCSG. 2.  The fine print is way, way too small.
>>>>> The ownership/authorship of those reports must be more
>>>>> prominent, and at least legible. Title or topic of report in a
>>>>> couple of words would be helpful, particularly to non-english
>>>>> speakers 5.  Get rid of the blank space, put an apostrophe in
>>>>> ICANN's Since we will be referring to the Ruggies principles,
>>>>> it might be good to add that to this slide (bullet one) again,
>>>>> to help folks follow the discussion better. 6.  I am a little
>>>>> worried that this last slide looks too ambitious.....but if the
>>>>> group feels our community is ready for it, damn the torpedoes.
>>>>> IMHO, we are not ready yet.... Thanks Niels for the opportunity
>>>>> to comment! Stephanie On 2015-06-21 11:41, Niels ten Oever
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been asked to give an overview of our CCWP work at the
>>>>>> GAC WG and at several constituencies, for this I made a draft
>>>>>> presentation. Please find it attached. Looking forward to
>>>>>> hear what you think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The presentations should take a maximum of 15 minutes,
>>>>>> including Q&A, so I'd like to keep it short. Let me know if
>>>>>> you thing something is missing or should be reformulated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll also work on a presentation of the report for Wednesdays
>>>>>> session, I will send that to you when it's ready for
>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to hear from you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Niels
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights
>>>>> mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights
>>>>> mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>>
>>> --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>> software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights
>>> mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-humanrights mailing list
>> cc-humanrights at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



More information about the cc-humanrights mailing list