[cc-humanrights] Our sessions in ICANN 56 - issue with meeting B schedule

[Niels ten Oever]

Eventhough I understand the rationale, I think it would be really bad if
the CCWP could not meet in Heslinki now that CCWG on Accountability
expressed interested in building on work and liaising with CCWP HR, same
holds true for the GAC, so I think there is a strong argument for giving
us a slot.

Who could we speak to about this?

Best,

Niels

Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

On 03/05/2016 12:21 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple messages, but the paragraph and links below may
> be useful to frame and inform the discussions among the members of the
> CCWP list.
> Thanks
> Marília
> 
> New Meeting Strategy update
> 
> *What it's about:* The GNSO will discuss responses to its proposal for
> scheduling the new "Meeting B", to begin at ICANN56. The GNSO's proposal
> was circulated to the ICANN Board and other ICANN Supporting
> Organizations and Advisory Committees. A response has been received from
> the ICANN Board and discussions continue with the other SO/ACs.
> 
> *Background
> information:* http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/crocker-to-bladel-12feb16-en.pdf
> 
> *Policy Staff responsible:* Marika Konings
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/crocker-to-bladel-12feb16-en.pdf>
> 
> *Presentation:* PDF slide deck
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56989753/Meetings_Strategy.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1457091023000&api=v2>
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com
> <mailto:mariliamaciel at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Dear all, 
> 
>     We are at GNSO discussing now the structure of meeting B. As far as
>     I understand, meeting B will be very much focused on policy
>     development. I asked a question now about the space in the schedule
>     to sessions such as CCWP public session on human rights and others.
>     The answer I got from our GNSO representative on meeting B
>     discussions and from staff was that probably there will not be space
>     in meeting B for these kind of gatherings. Staff added that maybe
>     there will be consideration of requests coming from chartered
>     efforts (some CCWGs mostly linked with policy topics). 
> 
>     My understanding is that the work being carried out by the CCWP
>     human rights feeds into policy discussions and in the future into
>     WS2. It should not be considered an "extracurricular activity", but
>     as a gathering related to policy discussions. If others believe this
>     is also the case, the CCWP may want to consider discussing and
>     intervening on the planning of meeting B.
> 
>     Thanks 
>     Marília
> 
>     -- 
>     *Marília Maciel*
>     Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV
>     Direito Rio
>     Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV
>     Law School
>     http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
> 
>     DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu>
>     PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>     Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the
>     Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Marília Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
> School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
> 
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu>
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
> Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the
> Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20160305/14660d72/signature.asc>