[cc-humanrights] CCWP Meeting: This Thursday!

[David Cake]

The Expedited PDP model is a much abbreviated version of the normal PDP process, and it specifically does NOT include the steps involving as Issue Report, which is how an initial impact assessment performed by staff/contractors would be incorporated into the process.

For an expedited PDP, we would need to work out a separate process for incorporating an impact assessment - and given the seriously urgency of completion of the EPDP (by ICANN standards, anyway) it is very unlikely that an initial Issue Report stage is likely to happen, as it would add months of time to process. If we want an impact assessment to happen, we need to start making the board aware of that as soon as we can, and we probably, realistically, need to be thinking about a practical way in which that impact assessment can be dealt with in parallel to the main EPDP process, rather than preceding it as a normal PDP Issue Report would.

Though a privacy impact assessment for the GDPR process seems somewhat redundant, there may be other rights we should be looking at.

David


> On 2 May 2018, at 3:59 pm, Collin Kurre <collin at article19.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> There was mention on the [Accred-Model] list of an “expedited PDP” to define the GDPR interim compliance model. If this comes to pass, the process would benefit from the inclusion of an impact assessment, either specific to privacy or preferably to human rights more broadly. Stephanie Perrin and a couple others suggested this in San Juan.
> 
> This would also be a good opportunity to test drive compliance models or mechanisms that could be applied to standard, non-expedited PDPs once the human rights core value comes into effect.
> 
> Hope to see you on the call tomorrow!
> 
> Best,
> Collin
> 
> On May 1, 2018, at 21:58, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi what is the intended content of the GDPR topic?
>> 
>> 
>>> On 1 May 2018, at 22:24, Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com <mailto:mkaranicolas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Time flies! Our next scheduled call for the CCWP on Human Rights is this Thursday, 03 May 2018 at 14:00 UTC.
>>> 
>>> I'm attaching our proposed agenda below. Please don't hesitate to let us know if there's anything else you would like to discuss.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Michael and Collin
>>> 
>>> ---------
>>> 
>>> Proposed Agenda: CCWP on Human Rights Meeting
>>> 3 May 2018: 1400 UTC
>>> 
>>> ·      Updates
>>> o   Website
>>> o   ICANN org HRIA
>>> o   HRIA GNSO model
>>> ·      GDPR - Expedited PDP?
>>> ·      ICANN’s HRIA with Löning
>>> ·      Human rights PDP paper
>>> ·      AOB
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cc-humanrights mailing list
>>> cc-humanrights at icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-humanrights mailing list
>> cc-humanrights at icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20180502/d5795c60/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20180502/d5795c60/signature.asc>