From collin at article19.org Tue Feb 5 17:30:31 2019 From: collin at article19.org (Collin Kurre) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:30:31 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Update on WS2 Implementation Message-ID: <3770A601-B635-4FDD-A1C6-444D4FD4518A@article19.org> Dear colleagues, I?m writing with an update from the recent ICANN Board Open Session on WS2 implementation, held 27 January in LA. The basic goals of the session were to clarify when the board will make a decision on approving the WS2 Recommendations, on what basis, and how the community will be consulted. If you?ve got 30 minutes to spare, you can watch the session here: https://participate.icann.org/p8wsolrzf59/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal&proto=true If not, notes from the session follow. As you may recall, only one of the WS2 recommendations pertains to human rights ? the recommendation that the board adopt the proposed Framework of Interpretation, thereby effecting the dormant Human Rights Bylaw. However, there are 111 more recommendations from seven other topics included in the WS2 package. Find them here: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Documents This package of recommendations was sent to the ICANN Board for approval on 8 November 2018. In theory, the Board should make their decision within 6 months. That timeline doesn?t seem to be binding, however, and there are a few things that need to happen first: Small Implementation Team of WS2 Co-Chairs / Rapporteurs assembled to assist and provide advice as needed Board will convene a ?Caucus Group? to follow WS2 Implementation and report back on progress Org will produce an Implementation Assessment Report to help Board consider report and feasibility of adopting recommendations as a package The Implementation Assessment Report was described as a high-level document to help set expectations with the community and provide info on timing, costs, and dependencies. It?s not meant to provide guidance on tradeoffs that may be needed with other things like implementation of new policies or innovation of existing programs or services. Those decisions will have to be made in consultation with the community, although it?s not yet clear how or when that will occur. Notably, attention was drawn to the fact that resources have only been allocated to WS2 as a contingency in the draft FY20 budget. The justification for not including WS2 in the draft budget doesn?t look promising in terms of timelines: When the WS2 Working Group completes its recommendations, the Board considers an implementation plan that includes the necessary resources. Until approved, the Board works with the community to identify the resources needed for implementation. Therefore, no resources are included for any implementation work until the Board adopts the recommendations. Community members are reminded that the public comment period on this draft budget is open for another 3 days, closing on Friday 8 Feb: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/fy20-budget-2018-12-17-en Kind regards, Collin Kurre CCWP-HR Co-Chair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mail at nielstenoever.net Tue Feb 5 17:40:05 2019 From: mail at nielstenoever.net (Niels ten Oever) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:40:05 +0100 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Update on WS2 Implementation In-Reply-To: <3770A601-B635-4FDD-A1C6-444D4FD4518A@article19.org> References: <3770A601-B635-4FDD-A1C6-444D4FD4518A@article19.org> Message-ID: Thanks for this Collin, Would this mean it would be useful to send in public comments to allocate funding to WS2 implementation, and not make it contingent? Am happy to send a comment in, but would be great if someone who followed the discussion more closely could help draft? Maybe based on the argument that WS2 _needs_ to be implemented, because that was the premise of the transition. Best, Niels On 2/5/19 6:30 PM, Collin Kurre wrote: > Dear colleagues,? > > I?m writing with an update from the recent ICANN Board Open Session on WS2 implementation, held 27 January in LA. The basic goals of the session were to clarify when the board will make a decision on approving the WS2 Recommendations, on what basis, and how the community will be consulted.?If you?ve got 30 minutes to spare, you can watch the session here: https://participate.icann.org/p8wsolrzf59/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal&proto=true?If not, notes from the session follow. > > As you may recall, only one of the WS2 recommendations pertains to human rights ??the recommendation that the board adopt the proposed Framework of Interpretation, thereby effecting the dormant Human Rights Bylaw. However, there?are 111 more recommendations from seven other topics included in the WS2 package. Find them here: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Documents > > This package of recommendations was sent to the ICANN Board for approval on 8 November 2018. In theory, the Board should make their decision within 6 months. That timeline doesn?t seem to be binding, however, and there are a few things that need to happen first: > > * Small Implementation Team of WS2 Co-Chairs / Rapporteurs assembled to assist and provide advice as needed > * Board will convene a ?Caucus Group? to follow WS2 Implementation and report back on progress > * Org will produce an Implementation Assessment Report to help Board consider report and feasibility of adopting recommendations as a package > > The Implementation Assessment Report was described as a high-level document to help set expectations with the community and provide info on timing, costs, and dependencies. It?s not meant to provide guidance on tradeoffs that may be needed with other things like implementation of new policies or innovation of existing programs or services. Those decisions will have to be made in consultation with the community, although it?s not yet clear how or when that will occur. > > Notably, attention was drawn to the fact that resources have only been allocated to WS2 as a contingency in the draft FY20 budget. The justification for not including WS2 in the draft budget doesn?t look promising in terms of timelines: > > /When the WS2 Working Group completes its recommendations, the Board considers an implementation plan that includes the necessary resources. Until approved, the Board works with the community to identify the resources needed for implementation. Therefore, no resources are included for any implementation work until the Board adopts the recommendations./ > > Community members are reminded that the public comment period on this draft budget is open for another 3 days, closing on Friday 8 Feb: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/fy20-budget-2018-12-17-en > > > Kind regards, > > Collin Kurre > CCWP-HR Co-Chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights > -- Niels ten Oever Researcher and PhD Candidate DATACTIVE Research Group University of Amsterdam PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3 From akriti at cis-india.org Tue Feb 5 18:38:51 2019 From: akriti at cis-india.org (Akriti) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [cc-humanrights] Update on WS2 Implementation In-Reply-To: References: <3770A601-B635-4FDD-A1C6-444D4FD4518A@article19.org> Message-ID: <4B50248EEF7FCB00.E6178555-E27F-4913-82E8-88B1A0F0A550@mail.outlook.com> Hi Niels, I'm planning to write a comment and would love to help draft this one. ? Best, Akriti Get Outlook for iOS On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:09 PM +0530, "Niels ten Oever" wrote: Thanks for this Collin, Would this mean it would be useful to send in public comments to allocate funding to WS2 implementation, and not make it contingent? Am happy to send a comment in, but would be great if someone who followed the discussion more closely could help draft? Maybe based on the argument that WS2 _needs_ to be implemented, because that was the premise of the transition. Best, Niels On 2/5/19 6:30 PM, Collin Kurre wrote: > Dear colleagues,? > > I?m writing with an update from the recent ICANN Board Open Session on WS2 implementation, held 27 January in LA. The basic goals of the session were to clarify when the board will make a decision on approving the WS2 Recommendations, on what basis, and how the community will be consulted.?If you?ve got 30 minutes to spare, you can watch the session here: https://participate.icann.org/p8wsolrzf59/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal&proto=true?If not, notes from the session follow. > > As you may recall, only one of the WS2 recommendations pertains to human rights ??the recommendation that the board adopt the proposed Framework of Interpretation, thereby effecting the dormant Human Rights Bylaw. However, there?are 111 more recommendations from seven other topics included in the WS2 package. Find them here: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Documents > > This package of recommendations was sent to the ICANN Board for approval on 8 November 2018. In theory, the Board should make their decision within 6 months. That timeline doesn?t seem to be binding, however, and there are a few things that need to happen first: > > * Small Implementation Team of WS2 Co-Chairs / Rapporteurs assembled to assist and provide advice as needed > * Board will convene a ?Caucus Group? to follow WS2 Implementation and report back on progress > * Org will produce an Implementation Assessment Report to help Board consider report and feasibility of adopting recommendations as a package > > The Implementation Assessment Report was described as a high-level document to help set expectations with the community and provide info on timing, costs, and dependencies. It?s not meant to provide guidance on tradeoffs that may be needed with other things like implementation of new policies or innovation of existing programs or services. Those decisions will have to be made in consultation with the community, although it?s not yet clear how or when that will occur. > > Notably, attention was drawn to the fact that resources have only been allocated to WS2 as a contingency in the draft FY20 budget. The justification for not including WS2 in the draft budget doesn?t look promising in terms of timelines: > > /When the WS2 Working Group completes its recommendations, the Board considers an implementation plan that includes the necessary resources. Until approved, the Board works with the community to identify the resources needed for implementation. Therefore, no resources are included for any implementation work until the Board adopts the recommendations./ > > Community members are reminded that the public comment period on this draft budget is open for another 3 days, closing on Friday 8 Feb: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/fy20-budget-2018-12-17-en > > > Kind regards, > > Collin Kurre > CCWP-HR Co-Chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights > -- Niels ten Oever Researcher and PhD Candidate DATACTIVE Research Group University of Amsterdam PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3 _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Feb 5 20:00:48 2019 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:00:48 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Update on WS2 Implementation In-Reply-To: References: <3770A601-B635-4FDD-A1C6-444D4FD4518A@article19.org> Message-ID: <0b83eacf-1a69-2276-a3df-8aea0b3b560b@mail.utoronto.ca> Actually I think the real money for workstream 2 will come in the five year plan....as it unfolds. We need to comment on that as well, perhaps, noting the impossibility of acting on 111 recs in a short time without funding. cheers and thanks for bringing this to our attention Collin!!!! Very helpful, it is such a busy time. cheers Stephanie Perrin I?m writing with an update from the recent ICANN Board Open Session on WS2 implementation, held 27 January in LA. The basic goals of the session were to clarify when the board will make a decision on approving the WS2 Recommendations, on what basis, and how the community will be consulted. If you?ve got 30 minutes to spare, you can watch the session here: https://participate.icann.org/p8wsolrzf59/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal&proto=true If not, notes from the session follow. As you may recall, only one of the WS2 recommendations pertains to human rights ? the recommendation that the board adopt the proposed Framework of Interpretation, thereby effecting the dormant Human Rights Bylaw. However, there are 111 more recommendations from seven other topics included in the WS2 package. Find them here: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Documents This package of recommendations was sent to the ICANN Board for approval on 8 November 2018. In theory, the Board should make their decision within 6 months. That timeline doesn?t seem to be binding, however, and there are a few things that need to happen first: * Small Implementation Team of WS2 Co-Chairs / Rapporteurs assembled to assist and provide advice as needed * Board will convene a ?Caucus Group? to follow WS2 Implementation and report back on progress * Org will produce an Implementation Assessment Report to help Board consider report and feasibility of adopting recommendations as a package The Implementation Assessment Report was described as a high-level document to help set expectations with the community and provide info on timing, costs, and dependencies. It?s not meant to provide guidance on tradeoffs that may be needed with other things like implementation of new policies or innovation of existing programs or services. Those decisions will have to be made in consultation with the community, although it?s not yet clear how or when that will occur. Notably, attention was drawn to the fact that resources have only been allocated to WS2 as a contingency in the draft FY20 budget. The justification for not including WS2 in the draft budget doesn?t look promising in terms of timelines: /When the WS2 Working Group completes its recommendations, the Board considers an implementation plan that includes the necessary resources. Until approved, the Board works with the community to identify the resources needed for implementation. Therefore, no resources are included for any implementation work until the Board adopts the recommendations./ Community members are reminded that the public comment period on this draft budget is open for another 3 days, closing on Friday 8 Feb: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/fy20-budget-2018-12-17-en Kind regards, Collin Kurre CCWP-HR Co-Chair _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zalnieriute at gmail.com Tue Feb 5 21:38:42 2019 From: zalnieriute at gmail.com (zalnieriute) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 08:38:42 +1100 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Update on WS2 Implementation In-Reply-To: <0b83eacf-1a69-2276-a3df-8aea0b3b560b@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3770A601-B635-4FDD-A1C6-444D4FD4518A@article19.org> <0b83eacf-1a69-2276-a3df-8aea0b3b560b@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Thanks, Collin, For sharing this important information, it is really useful to know where the process is at. Thanks and keep in touch, Monika On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:01 AM Stephanie Perrin < stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Actually I think the real money for workstream 2 will come in the five > year plan....as it unfolds. We need to comment on that as well, perhaps, > noting the impossibility of acting on 111 recs in a short time without > funding. > > cheers and thanks for bringing this to our attention Collin!!!! Very > helpful, it is such a busy time. > > cheers > > Stephanie Perrin > > I?m writing with an update from the recent ICANN Board Open Session on WS2 implementation, held 27 January in LA. The basic goals of the session were to clarify when the board will make a decision on approving the WS2 Recommendations, on what basis, and how the community will be consulted. If you?ve got 30 minutes to spare, you can watch the session here: https://participate.icann.org/p8wsolrzf59/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal&proto=true If not, notes from the session follow. > > As you may recall, only one of the WS2 recommendations pertains to human rights ? the recommendation that the board adopt the proposed Framework of Interpretation, thereby effecting the dormant Human Rights Bylaw. However, there are 111 more recommendations from seven other topics included in the WS2 package. Find them here: https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Documents > > This package of recommendations was sent to the ICANN Board for approval on 8 November 2018. In theory, the Board should make their decision within 6 months. That timeline doesn?t seem to be binding, however, and there are a few things that need to happen first: > > * Small Implementation Team of WS2 Co-Chairs / Rapporteurs assembled to assist and provide advice as needed > * Board will convene a ?Caucus Group? to follow WS2 Implementation and report back on progress > * Org will produce an Implementation Assessment Report to help Board consider report and feasibility of adopting recommendations as a package > > The Implementation Assessment Report was described as a high-level document to help set expectations with the community and provide info on timing, costs, and dependencies. It?s not meant to provide guidance on tradeoffs that may be needed with other things like implementation of new policies or innovation of existing programs or services. Those decisions will have to be made in consultation with the community, although it?s not yet clear how or when that will occur. > > Notably, attention was drawn to the fact that resources have only been allocated to WS2 as a contingency in the draft FY20 budget. The justification for not including WS2 in the draft budget doesn?t look promising in terms of timelines: > > /When the WS2 Working Group completes its recommendations, the Board considers an implementation plan that includes the necessary resources. Until approved, the Board works with the community to identify the resources needed for implementation. Therefore, no resources are included for any implementation work until the Board adopts the recommendations./ > > Community members are reminded that the public comment period on this draft budget is open for another 3 days, closing on Friday 8 Feb: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/fy20-budget-2018-12-17-en > > > Kind regards, > > Collin Kurre > CCWP-HR Co-Chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights > -- Kind regards, Dr. Monika Zalnieriute Post-Doctoral Fellow @ Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I 185 Pelham St, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia I Visiting Fellow @ Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu I Representative @ Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org I -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From collin at article19.org Thu Feb 14 19:26:30 2019 From: collin at article19.org (Collin Kurre) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:26:30 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Trial HRIA update + next call Message-ID: <9B5EEA05-6EFB-4468-B05D-7E36B1853D13@article19.org> Dear colleagues, I?m pleased to announce that our trial Human Rights Impact Assessment on the Subsequent Procedures PDP is now ready for comments! Before you click the link, please note: - The issues listed in the document are neither definitive nor comprehensive, and - This is a draft methodology with room for improvement. Dive right in! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EKpMCef8kiZ2tJE2AU78q9_oeJehGbR7bWpQ5wt7D5I/edit?usp=sharing Our next CCWP-HR call will be held Wednesday 20 February at 1400 UTC (calendar invite attached). This call will feature a brief presentation about how the HRIA models have evolved over time, but it will largely be dedicated to community discussion on the opportunities, challenges, and overall viability of the latest model. Members who have been active in the Sub Pros PDP are encouraged to attend. Please feel free to share your impressions and questions on-list beforehand, or leave comments directly in the spreadsheet that we can address during the call. Many thanks, see you next week, Collin ============== Suggested Workflow for Trial ICANN Policy HRIA Identify PDP for trial: Subsequent Procedures ?? Gather and review resources on select PDP. This will be an important step for members who aren?t currently active in the target PDP. Shared folders and communication channels will be established to promote knowledge exchange. ?? HRIA Team attends at least 3 meetings of the PDP to get a feel for the group?s status and key players. Newcomers will also have the opportunity to shadow veterans and observe the PDP process in action. ?? Jointly determine the best approach for carrying out the assessment based on shared experiences in the target PDP. Example methodologies: direct participation, interviews, mailing list reviews, desk research, or any combination thereof. We can dedicate one of our CCWP-HR calls to this discussion. Complete and publish assessment with the methodology clearly explained in an annex. Repeat! Building on lessons learned in the first trial. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: iCal-20190214-190701.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 11316 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From collin at article19.org Tue Feb 19 15:24:51 2019 From: collin at article19.org (Collin Kurre) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:24:51 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Call tomorrow @ 1400 UTC In-Reply-To: <9B5EEA05-6EFB-4468-B05D-7E36B1853D13@article19.org> References: <9B5EEA05-6EFB-4468-B05D-7E36B1853D13@article19.org> Message-ID: <4833BAE2-4056-4187-AEA4-CBEBE9219D65@article19.org> Dear colleagues, This is a friendly reminder that we will have a CCWP-HR call tomorrow (Wednesday) at 1400 UTC. The first half of the call will be dedicated to exploring work carried out on human rights impact assessments for ICANN PDPs (more information in the email below). Next, we?ll have a chat on issues raised in a recent paper published by one of our members, Monika Zalnieriute. (Monika will be unable to join us, sadly, but Akriti has kindly agreed to lead the discussion in her place.) We?ll wrap up the meeting with a brief discussion about the upcoming Kobe meeting. Let us know if you have any questions or would like to add anything else to the agenda. Thanks, Collin ========== CCWP-HR Call February 2019 https://participate.icann.org/ncsg Overview of past HRIA models Presentation of latest HRIA model Feedback on application of model to Sub Pros PDP Discussion and feedback on methodologies Paper for discussion: "From Human Rights Aspirations to Enforceable Obligations by Non-State Actors in the Digital Age: The Example of Internet Governance and ICANN .? CCWP-HR session at ICANN65 Kobe AOB > On 14 Feb 2019, at 19:26, Collin Kurre wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > I?m pleased to announce that our trial Human Rights Impact Assessment on the Subsequent Procedures PDP is now ready for comments! > > Before you click the link, please note: > - The issues listed in the document are neither definitive nor comprehensive, and > - This is a draft methodology with room for improvement. Dive right in! > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EKpMCef8kiZ2tJE2AU78q9_oeJehGbR7bWpQ5wt7D5I/edit?usp=sharing > > Our next CCWP-HR call will be held Wednesday 20 February at 1400 UTC (calendar invite attached). This call will feature a brief presentation about how the HRIA models have evolved over time, but it will largely be dedicated to community discussion on the opportunities, challenges, and overall viability of the latest model. Members who have been active in the Sub Pros PDP are encouraged to attend. > > Please feel free to share your impressions and questions on-list beforehand, or leave comments directly in the spreadsheet that we can address during the call. > > Many thanks, see you next week, > Collin > > > ============== > > Suggested Workflow for Trial ICANN Policy HRIA > > Identify PDP for trial: Subsequent Procedures ?? > Gather and review resources on select PDP. This will be an important step for members who aren?t currently active in the target PDP. Shared folders and communication channels will be established to promote knowledge exchange. ?? > HRIA Team attends at least 3 meetings of the PDP to get a feel for the group?s status and key players. Newcomers will also have the opportunity to shadow veterans and observe the PDP process in action. ?? > Jointly determine the best approach for carrying out the assessment based on shared experiences in the target PDP. Example methodologies: direct participation, interviews, mailing list reviews, desk research, or any combination thereof. We can dedicate one of our CCWP-HR calls to this discussion. > Complete and publish assessment with the methodology clearly explained in an annex. > Repeat! Building on lessons learned in the first trial. > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: iCal-20190214-190701.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 11316 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryam.bakoshi at icann.org Tue Feb 19 15:33:59 2019 From: maryam.bakoshi at icann.org (Maryam Bakoshi) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:33:59 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] **REMINDER**CCWP ICANN and Human Rights on Wednesday 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC Message-ID: <432abf514d004ccab1d8c73053840249@PMBX112-E1-VA-2.pexch112.icann.org> Dear All, **REMINDER** Please find participation details for the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call on Wednesday 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC Adobe Connect: https://participate.icann.org/ncsg Time Zones: https://tinyurl.com/y7btl3l5 Dial out request: please send an email to maryam.bakoshi at icann.org off list. Audio dial-in details below: [https://cobranding-pgi.s3.amazonaws.com/1/Logo1.png] You're invited. You've been invited to a GlobalMeet? audio meeting. Have the meeting call you. Click the Connect Me link below. No need to dial-in. Connect Me [go.conferencinghub.com] Not at your computer? You can join by dialing one of the access numbers below. Mobile: tel://16054755604,*,,9922790467# Phone Only Controls : https://go.conferencinghub.com/2xdh7 Access Number: 1-605-475-5604 Guest Passcode: 992 279 0467 Additional Access: USA: 1-605-475-5604 USA: 1-719-457-6209 Canada, Calgary: +1 403 407 5793 Canada, Montreal: +1 514 669 5928 Canada, Toronto: +1 647 426 9172 Canada, Vancouver: +1 604 222 7836 Argentina, Buenos Aires: +54 (0) 11 5172 6003 Argentina (toll free): 0800 800 1223 Australia, Sydney: +61 (0) 2 8017 6064 Australia, Melbourne: +61 (0) 3 8687 0553 Australia, Brisbane: +61 (0) 7 3015 0535 Australia (toll free): 1 800 804 786 Austria (toll free): 0800 070 981 Bahrain, Manama: +973 1619 8739 Bahrain (toll free): 800 04212 Belarus (toll free): 8 820 0011 0341 Belgium, Brussels: +32 (0) 2 400 6928 Belgium (toll free): 0800 39279 Bosnia and Herzegovina: +387 7031 1442 Brazil, Sao Paulo: +55 11 4935 7169 Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: +55 21 4560 0072 Brazil (toll free): 0800 887 0233 Bulgaria, Sofia: +359 (0) 2 491 6045 Bulgaria (toll free): 00800 111 4950 Cambodia, Phnom Penh: +855 23 965 723 Canada (toll free): 1 855 950 3717 Chile, Santiago: +56 (0) 2 2666 0696 Chile (toll free): 171 800 835 783 China (national): +400 613 8103 China, Beijing: +86 10 5667 0003 China, Shanghai: +86 21 2039 7081 Colombia, Bogota: +57 1 508 8137 Colombia (toll free): 01 800 755 0102 Costa Rica (toll free): 800 542 5328 Croatia (toll free): 0800 805 940 Cyprus (toll free): 800 97424 Czech Republic, Prague: +420 225 986 554 Czech Republic (toll free): 800 701 532 Denmark, Copenhagen: +45 32 72 78 10 Denmark (toll free): 80 70 35 86 Egypt (toll free): 0800 000 0593 Estonia, Tallinn: +372 622 6551 Estonia (toll free): 800 011 1589 Fiji (toll free): 00800 3322 Finland, Helsinki: +358 (0) 9 2310 1677 Finland (toll free): 0800 772 236 France, Paris: +33 (0) 1 70 37 16 56 France (toll free): 0800 946 531 France (national): 0811 655 100 France (national): 0821 231 671 Georgia, Tbilisi: +995 32 2 050 778 Germany, Frankfurt: +49 (0) 69 2222 10612 Germany, Munich: +49 (0) 89 2030 31207 Germany (national): 01801 003 899 Germany (toll free): 0800 588 9170 Greece, Athens: +30 211 181 3824 Greece (toll free): 00800 128 913 Hong Kong: +852 3018 9111 Hong Kong (toll free): 800 901 787 Hungary, Budapest: +36 1408 8953 Hungary (toll free): 068 001 9673 Iceland (toll free): 800 9847 India, Delhi: +91 11 6310 0268 India, Mumbai: +91 22 6310 0298 India, Chennai: +91 44 6310 0234 India, Bangalore: +91 80 6760 8755 India (toll free): 1800 3010 1582 Indonesia, Jakarta: +62 21 2188 9084 Indonesia (toll free): 007 803 321 8927 Ireland, Dublin: +353 (0) 1 526 9421 Ireland (national): 0818 270 271 Ireland (toll free): 1800 937 649 Ireland (national): 1890 907 630 Israel, Tel Aviv: +972 (0)3 721 7943 Israel (toll free): 1809 213 168 Italy, Milan: +39 02 3600 8006 Italy, Rome: +39 06 8750 0676 Italy (toll free): 800 146 094 Japan, Tokyo: +81 3 4560 1270 Japan, Osaka: +81 6 4560 2410 Japan (toll free): 0120 305 211 Japan (mobile): 0120 632 611 Japan (national): 0570 085 744 Jordan (toll free): 0800 22172 Kazakhstan (toll free): 8800 333 7554 Kenya, Nairobi: +254 (0)207 643 581 South Korea, Seoul: +82 (0) 2 6007 0079 South Korea (toll free): 00798 6136 1454 Kuwait (national): +965 2206 3002 Latvia, Riga: +371 6601 3627 Latvia (toll free): 8000 4418 Lithuania, Vilnius: +370 5205 5468 Lithuania (toll free): 8800 31449 Luxembourg: +352 2088 1749 Luxembourg (toll free): 800 28433 Macau (national): +853 6262 1676 Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: +60 (0) 3 7724 8010 Malaysia (toll free): 1 800 816 152 Mexico, Guadalajara: +52 33 4162 4504 Mexico, Mexico City: +52 55 8421 0326 Mexico, Monterrey: +52 81 4162 5648 Mexico (toll free): 01 800 733 4102 Morocco, Casablanca: +212 (0) 520 48 0022 Morocco (toll free): 0800 091 296 Netherlands, Amsterdam: +31 (0) 20 716 8345 Netherlands (toll free): 0800 020 2597 New Zealand, Christchurch: +64 (0) 3 974 2596 New Zealand, Wellington: +64 (0) 4 909 4674 New Zealand, Auckland: +64 (0) 9 929 1825 New Zealand (toll free): 0800 452 947 Nigeria, Lagos: +234 1 277 3944 Norway, Oslo: +47 21 00 48 15 Norway (toll free): 800 56081 Oman (toll free): 800 77265 Pakistan, Islamabad: +92 5181 08863 Panama, Panama City: +507 8 335 913 Panama (toll free): 00800 223 1390 Peru, Lima: +51 (0) 1 700 9571 Philippines, Manila: +63 (0)2 395 3426 Philippines (toll free): 1 800 111 013 99 Poland, Warsaw: +48 22 295 3570 Poland (toll free): 00 800 121 4356 Portugal, Lisbon: +351 21 316 4093 Portugal (toll free): 800 784 442 Qatar (freephone): 00 800 100 491 Romania, Bucharest: +40 (0) 21 529 3992 Romania (toll free): 0800 801 035 Russia, Moscow: +7 495 646 9181 Russia (toll free): 8 800 500 9241 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 844 6641 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 850 0219 Serbia (toll free): 0800 190 712 Singapore: +65 6654 9112 Singapore (toll free): 800 616 3192 Slovakia, Bratislava: +421 (0)2 3321 5498 Slovakia (toll free): 0800 002 002 Slovenia, Ljubljana: +386 1600 8695 Slovenia (toll free): 0800 81193 South Africa, Johannesburg: +27 (0)11 589 8321 South Africa (toll free): 0800 999 434 Spain, Madrid: +34 91 114 6653 Spain, Barcelona: +34 93 800 1946 Spain (toll free): 900 828 035 Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka: +94 720 910 333 Sweden, Stockholm: +46 (0) 8 5065 3956 Sweden (toll free): 0200 125 588 Switzerland, Geneva: +41 (0) 22 595 4795 Switzerland, Zurich: +41 (0) 44 580 7207 Switzerland (toll free): 0800 740 360 Taiwan, Taipei: +886 (0) 2 2650 7329 Taiwan (toll free): 0800 666 596 Thailand, Bangkok: +66 (0) 2104 0761 Thailand (toll free): 001 800 6136 1473 Tunisia, Tunis: +216 31 378 101 Turkey, Istanbul: +90 212 375 50 49 Turkey (toll free): 00800 4488 26642 Ukraine (toll free): 0800 500 896 UAE (toll free): 8000 3570 2662 UK (03): +44 (0)330 336 6002 UK (toll free): 0800 358 6385 UK (national): 0844 473 5010 UK (national): 0845 545 0015 USA /Canada (toll free): 1-866-398-2885 Uruguay (toll free): 0004 019 0152 Venezuela, Caracas: +58 212 720 2164 Venezuela (toll free): 0 800 162 7451 Vietnam, Hanoi: +84 24 4458 3312 Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh: +84 28 4458 1322 Vietnam (toll free): 1800 9226 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 13525 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maryam.bakoshi at icann.org Wed Feb 20 10:48:04 2019 From: maryam.bakoshi at icann.org (Maryam Bakoshi) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:48:04 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] **REMINDER**CCWP ICANN and Human Rights on Wednesday 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC Message-ID: <4a59414de7b04f5b9bfef09329d32efe@PMBX112-E1-VA-2.pexch112.icann.org> Dear All, **REMINDER** Please find participation details for the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call on Wednesday 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC Adobe Connect: https://participate.icann.org/ncsg Time Zones: https://tinyurl.com/y7btl3l5 Dial out request: please send an email to maryam.bakoshi at icann.org off list. Audio dial-in details below: [https://cobranding-pgi.s3.amazonaws.com/1/Logo1.png] You're invited. You've been invited to a GlobalMeet? audio meeting. Have the meeting call you. Click the Connect Me link below. No need to dial-in. Connect Me [go.conferencinghub.com] Not at your computer? You can join by dialing one of the access numbers below. Mobile: tel://16054755604,*,,9922790467# Phone Only Controls : https://go.conferencinghub.com/2xdh7 Access Number: 1-605-475-5604 Guest Passcode: 992 279 0467 Additional Access: USA: 1-605-475-5604 USA: 1-719-457-6209 Canada, Calgary: +1 403 407 5793 Canada, Montreal: +1 514 669 5928 Canada, Toronto: +1 647 426 9172 Canada, Vancouver: +1 604 222 7836 Argentina, Buenos Aires: +54 (0) 11 5172 6003 Argentina (toll free): 0800 800 1223 Australia, Sydney: +61 (0) 2 8017 6064 Australia, Melbourne: +61 (0) 3 8687 0553 Australia, Brisbane: +61 (0) 7 3015 0535 Australia (toll free): 1 800 804 786 Austria (toll free): 0800 070 981 Bahrain, Manama: +973 1619 8739 Bahrain (toll free): 800 04212 Belarus (toll free): 8 820 0011 0341 Belgium, Brussels: +32 (0) 2 400 6928 Belgium (toll free): 0800 39279 Bosnia and Herzegovina: +387 7031 1442 Brazil, Sao Paulo: +55 11 4935 7169 Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: +55 21 4560 0072 Brazil (toll free): 0800 887 0233 Bulgaria, Sofia: +359 (0) 2 491 6045 Bulgaria (toll free): 00800 111 4950 Cambodia, Phnom Penh: +855 23 965 723 Canada (toll free): 1 855 950 3717 Chile, Santiago: +56 (0) 2 2666 0696 Chile (toll free): 171 800 835 783 China (national): +400 613 8103 China, Beijing: +86 10 5667 0003 China, Shanghai: +86 21 2039 7081 Colombia, Bogota: +57 1 508 8137 Colombia (toll free): 01 800 755 0102 Costa Rica (toll free): 800 542 5328 Croatia (toll free): 0800 805 940 Cyprus (toll free): 800 97424 Czech Republic, Prague: +420 225 986 554 Czech Republic (toll free): 800 701 532 Denmark, Copenhagen: +45 32 72 78 10 Denmark (toll free): 80 70 35 86 Egypt (toll free): 0800 000 0593 Estonia, Tallinn: +372 622 6551 Estonia (toll free): 800 011 1589 Fiji (toll free): 00800 3322 Finland, Helsinki: +358 (0) 9 2310 1677 Finland (toll free): 0800 772 236 France, Paris: +33 (0) 1 70 37 16 56 France (toll free): 0800 946 531 France (national): 0811 655 100 France (national): 0821 231 671 Georgia, Tbilisi: +995 32 2 050 778 Germany, Frankfurt: +49 (0) 69 2222 10612 Germany, Munich: +49 (0) 89 2030 31207 Germany (national): 01801 003 899 Germany (toll free): 0800 588 9170 Greece, Athens: +30 211 181 3824 Greece (toll free): 00800 128 913 Hong Kong: +852 3018 9111 Hong Kong (toll free): 800 901 787 Hungary, Budapest: +36 1408 8953 Hungary (toll free): 068 001 9673 Iceland (toll free): 800 9847 India, Delhi: +91 11 6310 0268 India, Mumbai: +91 22 6310 0298 India, Chennai: +91 44 6310 0234 India, Bangalore: +91 80 6760 8755 India (toll free): 1800 3010 1582 Indonesia, Jakarta: +62 21 2188 9084 Indonesia (toll free): 007 803 321 8927 Ireland, Dublin: +353 (0) 1 526 9421 Ireland (national): 0818 270 271 Ireland (toll free): 1800 937 649 Ireland (national): 1890 907 630 Israel, Tel Aviv: +972 (0)3 721 7943 Israel (toll free): 1809 213 168 Italy, Milan: +39 02 3600 8006 Italy, Rome: +39 06 8750 0676 Italy (toll free): 800 146 094 Japan, Tokyo: +81 3 4560 1270 Japan, Osaka: +81 6 4560 2410 Japan (toll free): 0120 305 211 Japan (mobile): 0120 632 611 Japan (national): 0570 085 744 Jordan (toll free): 0800 22172 Kazakhstan (toll free): 8800 333 7554 Kenya, Nairobi: +254 (0)207 643 581 South Korea, Seoul: +82 (0) 2 6007 0079 South Korea (toll free): 00798 6136 1454 Kuwait (national): +965 2206 3002 Latvia, Riga: +371 6601 3627 Latvia (toll free): 8000 4418 Lithuania, Vilnius: +370 5205 5468 Lithuania (toll free): 8800 31449 Luxembourg: +352 2088 1749 Luxembourg (toll free): 800 28433 Macau (national): +853 6262 1676 Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: +60 (0) 3 7724 8010 Malaysia (toll free): 1 800 816 152 Mexico, Guadalajara: +52 33 4162 4504 Mexico, Mexico City: +52 55 8421 0326 Mexico, Monterrey: +52 81 4162 5648 Mexico (toll free): 01 800 733 4102 Morocco, Casablanca: +212 (0) 520 48 0022 Morocco (toll free): 0800 091 296 Netherlands, Amsterdam: +31 (0) 20 716 8345 Netherlands (toll free): 0800 020 2597 New Zealand, Christchurch: +64 (0) 3 974 2596 New Zealand, Wellington: +64 (0) 4 909 4674 New Zealand, Auckland: +64 (0) 9 929 1825 New Zealand (toll free): 0800 452 947 Nigeria, Lagos: +234 1 277 3944 Norway, Oslo: +47 21 00 48 15 Norway (toll free): 800 56081 Oman (toll free): 800 77265 Pakistan, Islamabad: +92 5181 08863 Panama, Panama City: +507 8 335 913 Panama (toll free): 00800 223 1390 Peru, Lima: +51 (0) 1 700 9571 Philippines, Manila: +63 (0)2 395 3426 Philippines (toll free): 1 800 111 013 99 Poland, Warsaw: +48 22 295 3570 Poland (toll free): 00 800 121 4356 Portugal, Lisbon: +351 21 316 4093 Portugal (toll free): 800 784 442 Qatar (freephone): 00 800 100 491 Romania, Bucharest: +40 (0) 21 529 3992 Romania (toll free): 0800 801 035 Russia, Moscow: +7 495 646 9181 Russia (toll free): 8 800 500 9241 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 844 6641 Saudi Arabia (toll free): 800 850 0219 Serbia (toll free): 0800 190 712 Singapore: +65 6654 9112 Singapore (toll free): 800 616 3192 Slovakia, Bratislava: +421 (0)2 3321 5498 Slovakia (toll free): 0800 002 002 Slovenia, Ljubljana: +386 1600 8695 Slovenia (toll free): 0800 81193 South Africa, Johannesburg: +27 (0)11 589 8321 South Africa (toll free): 0800 999 434 Spain, Madrid: +34 91 114 6653 Spain, Barcelona: +34 93 800 1946 Spain (toll free): 900 828 035 Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka: +94 720 910 333 Sweden, Stockholm: +46 (0) 8 5065 3956 Sweden (toll free): 0200 125 588 Switzerland, Geneva: +41 (0) 22 595 4795 Switzerland, Zurich: +41 (0) 44 580 7207 Switzerland (toll free): 0800 740 360 Taiwan, Taipei: +886 (0) 2 2650 7329 Taiwan (toll free): 0800 666 596 Thailand, Bangkok: +66 (0) 2104 0761 Thailand (toll free): 001 800 6136 1473 Tunisia, Tunis: +216 31 378 101 Turkey, Istanbul: +90 212 375 50 49 Turkey (toll free): 00800 4488 26642 Ukraine (toll free): 0800 500 896 UAE (toll free): 8000 3570 2662 UK (03): +44 (0)330 336 6002 UK (toll free): 0800 358 6385 UK (national): 0844 473 5010 UK (national): 0845 545 0015 USA /Canada (toll free): 1-866-398-2885 Uruguay (toll free): 0004 019 0152 Venezuela, Caracas: +58 212 720 2164 Venezuela (toll free): 0 800 162 7451 Vietnam, Hanoi: +84 24 4458 3312 Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh: +84 28 4458 1322 Vietnam (toll free): 1800 9226 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 13643 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maryam.bakoshi at icann.org Wed Feb 20 15:18:18 2019 From: maryam.bakoshi at icann.org (Maryam Bakoshi) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:18:18 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Message-ID: <4A16E9CD-34CD-42EC-ADFD-D4E0A8C730AC@icann.org> Dear All, Please find presentation slides, attendance and recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Attendance: Akriti Bopana, Austin Ruckstuhl, Bruna Santos, Collin Kurre, David McAuley, Desara Dushi, Emily Escartin, Herb Waye, Ioana Stupariu, Joanna Kulesza, Louise Marie Hurel, Meghan Healy, Mequanint Yehuala, Niels ten Oever, Stefan Filipovic | Staff: Maryam Bakoshi AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7h1l62kimb/ MP3: Attached AC Chat: Attached Presentation Slides: Attached -- Many thanks, Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ccwphr_200219.mp3 Type: audio/mpeg Size: 6480353 bytes Desc: ccwphr_200219.mp3 URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CCWP-HR Feb19 meeting.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1824509 bytes Desc: CCWP-HR Feb19 meeting.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: acchat_ccwphr_200219.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 142300 bytes Desc: acchat_ccwphr_200219.pdf URL: From collin at article19.org Wed Feb 20 17:34:04 2019 From: collin at article19.org (Collin Kurre) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:34:04 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. In-Reply-To: <4A16E9CD-34CD-42EC-ADFD-D4E0A8C730AC@icann.org> References: <4A16E9CD-34CD-42EC-ADFD-D4E0A8C730AC@icann.org> Message-ID: <51134AB1-78D3-4B2E-B025-CB49901D1557@article19.org> Thanks! Following up, here are some questions ahead of our Kobe meeting: GENERAL How can we get people to interact with this new work on HRIAs? Which groups / people should we invite to discuss impact assessments as a tool for constructive engagement across stakeholder groups? What other topics or issues should be discussed during our F2F session? MODEL (spreadsheet ) How can we make the link to human rights clearer? Proposal: add an explainer tab What?s missing / confusing / unnecessary / etc? Proposal: include vulnerable groups in description Proposal: add new column on Applicable Human Rights Law METHODOLOGY Who should carry out the impact assessments? Proposal: members of the CCWP-HR When should the assessment be carried out? Proposal: continuously, from inception until final report, feeding into all public comment periods What?s the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? Please feel free to share any additional thoughts or comments. Greetings from London, Collin > On 20 Feb 2019, at 15:18, Maryam Bakoshi wrote: > > Dear All, > > Please find presentation slides, attendance and recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. > > Attendance: Akriti Bopana, Austin Ruckstuhl, Bruna Santos, Collin Kurre, David McAuley, Desara Dushi, Emily Escartin, Herb Waye, Ioana Stupariu, Joanna Kulesza, Louise Marie Hurel, Meghan Healy, Mequanint Yehuala, Niels ten Oever, Stefan Filipovic | Staff: Maryam Bakoshi > > AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7h1l62kimb/ > > MP3: Attached > > AC Chat: Attached > > Presentation Slides: Attached > > > -- > Many thanks, > > Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator > ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers > S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jamie at dotgay.com Thu Feb 21 16:56:49 2019 From: jamie at dotgay.com (Jamie Baxter) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:56:49 -0700 Subject: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 Message-ID: <20190221095649.23960f87a7c01f36cb042bedb72edf07.4d459fce08.wbe@email23.godaddy.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mazzone at ebu.ch Fri Feb 22 17:02:29 2019 From: mazzone at ebu.ch (Mazzone, Giacomo) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:02:29 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 In-Reply-To: <20190221095649.23960f87a7c01f36cb042bedb72edf07.4d459fce08.wbe@email23.godaddy.com> References: <20190221095649.23960f87a7c01f36cb042bedb72edf07.4d459fce08.wbe@email23.godaddy.com> Message-ID: I totally share and support the view of Jamie. What happened during the first round of TLD has been a dramatic experience from which we have all to learn a lot to avoid to repeat similar mistake in the future. I would add one more point. We need also some ?positive discriminations?. It?s morally unacceptable that communities seeking to get the recognition of their rights could be trapped in a process (like the CPE), that cost 10 times more than announced/expected and drag for 5 years. And they have to support all costs, having in front giants like Amazon, Google or Tld companies that have at their payroll dozens of lawyers? This is totally unfair and those that are fighting for their rights cannot be considered as those that are only making business as usual. The report of Council of Europe was quite clear on its conclusions. Giacomo Mazzone From: cc-humanrights On Behalf Of Jamie Baxter Sent: jeudi, 21 f?vrier 2019 17:57 To: cc-humanrights at icann.org Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 Good morning Collin My apologies for not being able to join the call yesterday. I have however listened to the recording and wanted to respond to some of the questions you have noted below. MODEL: Proposal: Include vulnerable groups in description I believe this is imperative to ensure further disadvantage is not created, permitted, or ignored. METHODOLOGY: When should the assessment be carried out? I think it would be extremely important to have ears and voices representing the human rights impact perspective involved in PDP processes from day one and throughout to ensure that discussions are informed about human rights touch points early on and avoid policy directions that later require backtracking. I also believe that these voices will help to provide a balance to interests that may inadvertently lack consideration for the human rights impact. Being part of all public comment processes is also extremely important and necessary given that the multi-stakeholder model is fueled by documented voices, and gives preference to majority voices over minority. What's the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? I'm not 100% sure that it is necessary to link newcomers to veteran knowledge at ICANN. I think it is more productive and refreshing to allow the raw instincts and experience of human rights experts to compliment or challenge PDP discussions on the merits, and not legacy. Understanding the mission and scope of ICANN is important, but I don't think full historical or procedural integration is necessary or necessarily healthy inside an organization that should be open to all inspiration and energy that helps it better develop policy to serve the global public interest. Much thanks. Jamie Baxter dotgay LLC -------- Original Message -------- Subject: cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 From: cc-humanrights-request at icann.org Date: Thu, February 21, 2019 7:00 am To: cc-humanrights at icann.org Send cc-humanrights mailing list submissions to cc-humanrights at icann.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cc-humanrights-request at icann.org You can reach the person managing the list at cc-humanrights-owner at icann.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cc-humanrights digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. (Collin Kurre) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:34:04 +0000 From: Collin Kurre > To: Human Rights > Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Message-ID: <51134AB1-78D3-4B2E-B025-CB49901D1557 at article19.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thanks! Following up, here are some questions ahead of our Kobe meeting: GENERAL How can we get people to interact with this new work on HRIAs? Which groups / people should we invite to discuss impact assessments as a tool for constructive engagement across stakeholder groups? What other topics or issues should be discussed during our F2F session? MODEL (spreadsheet ) How can we make the link to human rights clearer? Proposal: add an explainer tab What?s missing / confusing / unnecessary / etc? Proposal: include vulnerable groups in description Proposal: add new column on Applicable Human Rights Law METHODOLOGY Who should carry out the impact assessments? Proposal: members of the CCWP-HR When should the assessment be carried out? Proposal: continuously, from inception until final report, feeding into all public comment periods What?s the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? Please feel free to share any additional thoughts or comments. Greetings from London, Collin > On 20 Feb 2019, at 15:18, Maryam Bakoshi > wrote: > > Dear All, > > Please find presentation slides, attendance and recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. > > Attendance: Akriti Bopana, Austin Ruckstuhl, Bruna Santos, Collin Kurre, David McAuley, Desara Dushi, Emily Escartin, Herb Waye, Ioana Stupariu, Joanna Kulesza, Louise Marie Hurel, Meghan Healy, Mequanint Yehuala, Niels ten Oever, Stefan Filipovic | Staff: Maryam Bakoshi > > AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7h1l62kimb/ > > MP3: Attached > > AC Chat: Attached > > Presentation Slides: Attached > > > -- > Many thanks, > > Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator > ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers > S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 > > 3>>>_______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights ------------------------------ End of cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 ********************************************* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway ************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michele at blacknight.com Fri Feb 22 17:07:38 2019 From: michele at blacknight.com (Michele Neylon - Blacknight) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:07:38 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 In-Reply-To: References: <20190221095649.23960f87a7c01f36cb042bedb72edf07.4d459fce08.wbe@email23.godaddy.com> Message-ID: But what is a ?community?? It?s very easy to say that it?s a problem, but unless you define what constitutes a community then I?m not sure I can agree with you. -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: cc-humanrights on behalf of "Mazzone, Giacomo" Date: Friday 22 February 2019 at 17:03 To: Jamie Baxter , "cc-humanrights at icann.org" Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 I totally share and support the view of Jamie. What happened during the first round of TLD has been a dramatic experience from which we have all to learn a lot to avoid to repeat similar mistake in the future. I would add one more point. We need also some ?positive discriminations?. It?s morally unacceptable that communities seeking to get the recognition of their rights could be trapped in a process (like the CPE), that cost 10 times more than announced/expected and drag for 5 years. And they have to support all costs, having in front giants like Amazon, Google or Tld companies that have at their payroll dozens of lawyers? This is totally unfair and those that are fighting for their rights cannot be considered as those that are only making business as usual. The report of Council of Europe was quite clear on its conclusions. Giacomo Mazzone From: cc-humanrights On Behalf Of Jamie Baxter Sent: jeudi, 21 f?vrier 2019 17:57 To: cc-humanrights at icann.org Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 Good morning Collin My apologies for not being able to join the call yesterday. I have however listened to the recording and wanted to respond to some of the questions you have noted below. MODEL: Proposal: Include vulnerable groups in description I believe this is imperative to ensure further disadvantage is not created, permitted, or ignored. METHODOLOGY: When should the assessment be carried out? I think it would be extremely important to have ears and voices representing the human rights impact perspective involved in PDP processes from day one and throughout to ensure that discussions are informed about human rights touch points early on and avoid policy directions that later require backtracking. I also believe that these voices will help to provide a balance to interests that may inadvertently lack consideration for the human rights impact. Being part of all public comment processes is also extremely important and necessary given that the multi-stakeholder model is fueled by documented voices, and gives preference to majority voices over minority. What's the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? I'm not 100% sure that it is necessary to link newcomers to veteran knowledge at ICANN. I think it is more productive and refreshing to allow the raw instincts and experience of human rights experts to compliment or challenge PDP discussions on the merits, and not legacy. Understanding the mission and scope of ICANN is important, but I don't think full historical or procedural integration is necessary or necessarily healthy inside an organization that should be open to all inspiration and energy that helps it better develop policy to serve the global public interest. Much thanks. Jamie Baxter dotgay LLC -------- Original Message -------- Subject: cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 From: cc-humanrights-request at icann.org Date: Thu, February 21, 2019 7:00 am To: cc-humanrights at icann.org Send cc-humanrights mailing list submissions to cc-humanrights at icann.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cc-humanrights-request at icann.org You can reach the person managing the list at cc-humanrights-owner at icann.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cc-humanrights digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. (Collin Kurre) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:34:04 +0000 From: Collin Kurre > To: Human Rights > Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Message-ID: <51134AB1-78D3-4B2E-B025-CB49901D1557 at article19.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thanks! Following up, here are some questions ahead of our Kobe meeting: GENERAL How can we get people to interact with this new work on HRIAs? Which groups / people should we invite to discuss impact assessments as a tool for constructive engagement across stakeholder groups? What other topics or issues should be discussed during our F2F session? MODEL (spreadsheet ) How can we make the link to human rights clearer? Proposal: add an explainer tab What?s missing / confusing / unnecessary / etc? Proposal: include vulnerable groups in description Proposal: add new column on Applicable Human Rights Law METHODOLOGY Who should carry out the impact assessments? Proposal: members of the CCWP-HR When should the assessment be carried out? Proposal: continuously, from inception until final report, feeding into all public comment periods What?s the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? Please feel free to share any additional thoughts or comments. Greetings from London, Collin > On 20 Feb 2019, at 15:18, Maryam Bakoshi > wrote: > > Dear All, > > Please find presentation slides, attendance and recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. > > Attendance: Akriti Bopana, Austin Ruckstuhl, Bruna Santos, Collin Kurre, David McAuley, Desara Dushi, Emily Escartin, Herb Waye, Ioana Stupariu, Joanna Kulesza, Louise Marie Hurel, Meghan Healy, Mequanint Yehuala, Niels ten Oever, Stefan Filipovic | Staff: Maryam Bakoshi > > AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7h1l62kimb/ > > MP3: Attached > > AC Chat: Attached > > Presentation Slides: Attached > > > -- > Many thanks, > > Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator > ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers > S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 > > 3>>>_______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights ------------------------------ End of cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 ********************************************* ________________________________ ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway ************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mazzone at ebu.ch Fri Feb 22 18:01:03 2019 From: mazzone at ebu.ch (Mazzone, Giacomo) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:01:03 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 In-Reply-To: References: <20190221095649.23960f87a7c01f36cb042bedb72edf07.4d459fce08.wbe@email23.godaddy.com> Message-ID: Dear Michele, Glad to meet you on line and thank for your question if it?s not rhetoric.. Would be tedious to reopen this long discussion once more across the whole mailing list. But if your question is serious, many indicators on how to recognize a community have been given all along these years of discussion within ICANN community. You can find it in the Council of Europe report and in the documents analysed by the ICANN Ombudsman when he investigated on CPE. Always available to help you in case you have difficulty to access it. The problem exists when there are strong monetary interests against. Then no serious discussion is possible. The wolf at the end of the Aesop?s tale ate the sheep anyway, despite all arguments and evidences provided?. If you sympathize with the wolf, I can do nothing for you. If you sympathize with the sheep, the I?m more than happy to discuss. ? Giacomo From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight Sent: vendredi, 22 f?vrier 2019 18:08 To: Mazzone, Giacomo ; Jamie Baxter ; cc-humanrights at icann.org Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 But what is a ?community?? It?s very easy to say that it?s a problem, but unless you define what constitutes a community then I?m not sure I can agree with you. -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: cc-humanrights > on behalf of "Mazzone, Giacomo" > Date: Friday 22 February 2019 at 17:03 To: Jamie Baxter >, "cc-humanrights at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 I totally share and support the view of Jamie. What happened during the first round of TLD has been a dramatic experience from which we have all to learn a lot to avoid to repeat similar mistake in the future. I would add one more point. We need also some ?positive discriminations?. It?s morally unacceptable that communities seeking to get the recognition of their rights could be trapped in a process (like the CPE), that cost 10 times more than announced/expected and drag for 5 years. And they have to support all costs, having in front giants like Amazon, Google or Tld companies that have at their payroll dozens of lawyers? This is totally unfair and those that are fighting for their rights cannot be considered as those that are only making business as usual. The report of Council of Europe was quite clear on its conclusions. Giacomo Mazzone From: cc-humanrights > On Behalf Of Jamie Baxter Sent: jeudi, 21 f?vrier 2019 17:57 To: cc-humanrights at icann.org Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 Good morning Collin My apologies for not being able to join the call yesterday. I have however listened to the recording and wanted to respond to some of the questions you have noted below. MODEL: Proposal: Include vulnerable groups in description I believe this is imperative to ensure further disadvantage is not created, permitted, or ignored. METHODOLOGY: When should the assessment be carried out? I think it would be extremely important to have ears and voices representing the human rights impact perspective involved in PDP processes from day one and throughout to ensure that discussions are informed about human rights touch points early on and avoid policy directions that later require backtracking. I also believe that these voices will help to provide a balance to interests that may inadvertently lack consideration for the human rights impact. Being part of all public comment processes is also extremely important and necessary given that the multi-stakeholder model is fueled by documented voices, and gives preference to majority voices over minority. What's the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? I'm not 100% sure that it is necessary to link newcomers to veteran knowledge at ICANN. I think it is more productive and refreshing to allow the raw instincts and experience of human rights experts to compliment or challenge PDP discussions on the merits, and not legacy. Understanding the mission and scope of ICANN is important, but I don't think full historical or procedural integration is necessary or necessarily healthy inside an organization that should be open to all inspiration and energy that helps it better develop policy to serve the global public interest. Much thanks. Jamie Baxter dotgay LLC -------- Original Message -------- Subject: cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 From: cc-humanrights-request at icann.org Date: Thu, February 21, 2019 7:00 am To: cc-humanrights at icann.org Send cc-humanrights mailing list submissions to cc-humanrights at icann.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cc-humanrights-request at icann.org You can reach the person managing the list at cc-humanrights-owner at icann.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cc-humanrights digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. (Collin Kurre) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:34:04 +0000 From: Collin Kurre > To: Human Rights > Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Message-ID: <51134AB1-78D3-4B2E-B025-CB49901D1557 at article19.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thanks! Following up, here are some questions ahead of our Kobe meeting: GENERAL How can we get people to interact with this new work on HRIAs? Which groups / people should we invite to discuss impact assessments as a tool for constructive engagement across stakeholder groups? What other topics or issues should be discussed during our F2F session? MODEL (spreadsheet ) How can we make the link to human rights clearer? Proposal: add an explainer tab What?s missing / confusing / unnecessary / etc? Proposal: include vulnerable groups in description Proposal: add new column on Applicable Human Rights Law METHODOLOGY Who should carry out the impact assessments? Proposal: members of the CCWP-HR When should the assessment be carried out? Proposal: continuously, from inception until final report, feeding into all public comment periods What?s the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? Please feel free to share any additional thoughts or comments. Greetings from London, Collin > On 20 Feb 2019, at 15:18, Maryam Bakoshi > wrote: > > Dear All, > > Please find presentation slides, attendance and recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. > > Attendance: Akriti Bopana, Austin Ruckstuhl, Bruna Santos, Collin Kurre, David McAuley, Desara Dushi, Emily Escartin, Herb Waye, Ioana Stupariu, Joanna Kulesza, Louise Marie Hurel, Meghan Healy, Mequanint Yehuala, Niels ten Oever, Stefan Filipovic | Staff: Maryam Bakoshi > > AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7h1l62kimb/ > > MP3: Attached > > AC Chat: Attached > > Presentation Slides: Attached > > > -- > Many thanks, > > Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator > ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers > S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 > > 3>>>_______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights ------------------------------ End of cc-humanrights Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9 ********************************************* ________________________________ ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway ************************************************** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway ************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aruckstuhl at cris.unu.edu Tue Feb 26 18:41:30 2019 From: aruckstuhl at cris.unu.edu (Austin Ruckstuhl) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:41:30 +0000 Subject: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. In-Reply-To: <51134AB1-78D3-4B2E-B025-CB49901D1557@article19.org> References: <4A16E9CD-34CD-42EC-ADFD-D4E0A8C730AC@icann.org> <51134AB1-78D3-4B2E-B025-CB49901D1557@article19.org> Message-ID: <1689E956-5A1B-4EEE-A8C4-429A18481938@cris.unu.edu> Hello Everyone, I?ve provided my answers to Collin?s questions below in Blue. I encourage more of you to chime in! ? Cheers, Austin Ruckstuhl From: cc-humanrights on behalf of Collin Kurre Date: Thursday, February 21, 2019 at 10:48 AM To: Human Rights Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] Attendance and Recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Thanks! Following up, here are some questions ahead of our Kobe meeting: GENERAL * How can we get people to interact with this new work on HRIAs? * I suggest we get a few model spreadsheets up and running simultaneously for each PDP (we can all it HRIA 1.0, to signal that it may evolve). Host all of the open access documents on the CCWP-HR website and spread the word to the community. We can even have a webinar tutorial to introduce the model and guide individuals on how to use it (hosted on youtube for easy access later). Give people multiple entry points. Engage highly with the 20% who contribute and don?t worry about the 80% who critique from the shadows. * Which groups / people should we invite to discuss impact assessments as a tool for constructive engagement across stakeholder groups? * I think everyone should be invited to learn about the tool and contribute. The more you inform people about the HRIA model, the more likely it is to be used in some form down the road. If you invite everyone to a training session on the new model, you might find that people will start to use it because they find political benefit in pointing out a human rights vulnerability. I would keep it simple. Recruit more interested people. Give them a chance to add data from their PDP or WG. Invite them to sign up to a newsletter or the mailing list. * What other topics or issues should be discussed during our F2F session? * I would keep it simple and clear to not overwhelm people. Have a feedback session. Training followed by Q&A on the new model. Just my suggestion. MODEL (spreadsheet) * How can we make the link to human rights clearer? * Proposal: add an explainer tab * What?s missing / confusing / unnecessary / etc? * Proposal: include vulnerable groups in description * Proposal: add new column on Applicable Human Rights Law * In my opinion, having the ?Focus? and ?Topic? columns are confusing on the left. If it were up to me, I would name Column A: ?Short Descriptions? as a unique identifier of issues. It could also be called ?Issue?. Then have Description as column B, followed by ?Focus? in C and ?Topic? in D. (See example below using the current data from the model.) This would allow you to lock the column like you have done to the top row. As the spreadsheet grows, this will allow for clarity. It also allows the reader to quickly review what types of issues that are being dealt with. Short Description Description Focus Topic Selection Criteria Selection criteria in Applicant Guidebook too general and not interpreted consistently Transparency Applicant Guidebook Deadline notice Applicants not provided with sufficient information regarding deadlines and time required to complete process Diversity Applicant Support Program Fee/cost information Applicants not provided with sufficient information on overall fees for costs Fairness Applicant Support Program Notice of scoring practice Unclear to applicants what criteria / which scoring practice will be used in selection practice Transparency Applicant Support Program Unlimited changes Unlimited changes permitted to application fields Transparency Application Process METHODOLOGY * Who should carry out the impact assessments? * Proposal: members of the CCWP-HR * I think definitely CCWP-HR should spearhead the work, but I think there should always be a way for anyone in the community to add their thoughts or input. * When should the assessment be carried out? * Proposal: continuously, from inception until final report, feeding into all public comment periods * Agree with everyone that it should be throughout and also during public comments. * What?s the best way to link the energy of newcomers and expertise of outsiders with the knowledge of ICANN veterans? * By asking good questions. We could send our working models to the PDP group and ask for input on an open call of ours. The more we inquire and remain open, the more likely they are to engage. Please feel free to share any additional thoughts or comments. Greetings from London, Collin On 20 Feb 2019, at 15:18, Maryam Bakoshi > wrote: Dear All, Please find presentation slides, attendance and recordings of the CCWP ICANN and Human Rights call of 20 February 2019 at 1400 UTC. Attendance: Akriti Bopana, Austin Ruckstuhl, Bruna Santos, Collin Kurre, David McAuley, Desara Dushi, Emily Escartin, Herb Waye, Ioana Stupariu, Joanna Kulesza, Louise Marie Hurel, Meghan Healy, Mequanint Yehuala, Niels ten Oever, Stefan Filipovic | Staff: Maryam Bakoshi AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7h1l62kimb/ MP3: Attached AC Chat: Attached Presentation Slides: Attached -- Many thanks, Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777 _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: