<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I meant checking quickly if there are other sessions (e.g. checking schedules in previous ICANN meetings or if someone is aware about new session) to mitigate risks of clashes, after submission we cannot request changes. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Rafik <br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-12-05 23:39 GMT+09:00 Marilia Maciel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mariliamaciel@gmail.com" target="_blank">mariliamaciel@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked..<br></div><br>Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours.<br><br></div><div>Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate.<br></div><div><br></div>Best,<br><br></div>Marília</div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi ,<div><br></div><div>I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot. </div><div><br></div><div>3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><span><font color="#888888"><br clear="all"><div><div><div dir="ltr">Rafik<br></div></div></div></font></span><div><div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank">ocl@gih.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello all,<br>
<br>
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it
because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and
other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little
interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the
week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now
dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have
Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what,
I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on
Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO
wrap up.<br>
<sigh><br>
<br>
Olivier<span><br>
<br>
<br>
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space:pre-wrap">> you can’t program on Monday,
they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.<br>
><br>
> I’d ask for Wednesday morning.<br>
><br>
> BD<br>
><br>
>> On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever
<a href="mailto:niels@article19.org" target="_blank"><niels@article19.org></a> wrote:<br>
>></span><br>
</span><div><div><blockquote type="cite">Hi Rafik,<br>
<br>
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out.
Can<br>
we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?<br>
<br>
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour<br>
meeting, so let's go for that.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Niels<br>
<br>
<br>
Niels ten Oever<br>
Head of Digital<br>
<br>
Article 19<br>
<a href="http://www.article19.org" target="_blank">www.article19.org</a><br>
<br>
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D
68E9<br>
<br>
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:<br>
>>> Hi Niels,<br>
>>><br>
>>> Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public
meeting and we had<br>
>>> such conflict last time.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Rafik<br>
>>><br>
>>> 2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever
<<a href="mailto:niels@article19.org" target="_blank">niels@article19.org</a> <br>
>>> <a href="mailto:niels@article19.org" target="_blank"><mailto:niels@article19.org></a>>:<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:<br>
>>>> Hi Niels,<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Hi Rafik,<br>
>>><br>
>>>> I am not senior within ICANN<br>
>>><br>
>>> Well, at least more senior than me ;)<br>
>>><br>
>>>> but I guess I can help for this.<br>
>>><br>
>>> That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on
Wednesday <br>
>>> afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours
would suffice. <br>
>>> Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even
though I know we <br>
>>> could easily fill it).<br>
>>><br>
>>> What do you people think?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Best,<br>
>>><br>
>>> Niels<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Rafik<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>> Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever
<<a href="mailto:niels@article19.org" target="_blank">niels@article19.org</a><br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:niels@article19.org" target="_blank"><mailto:niels@article19.org></a>> a écrit :<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Hi all,<br>
>>><br>
>>>> It seems there is consensus about the text for
the session at <br>
>>>> ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this
text? All <br>
>>>> comments are very welcome.<br>
>>><br>
>>>> _________<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Human right and ICANN - continuing the
conversation<br>
>>><br>
>>>> There is a growing recognition in parts of the
community that<br>
>>>> some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may
have implications<br>
>>>> for human rights like freedom of expression and
the right to<br>
>>>> privacy. While ICANN is not the place to
negotiate over such<br>
>>>> rights, it would be advisable on political and
other grounds to<br>
>>>> assess whether our work is fully consistent with
internationally<br>
>>>> agreed human rights laws and policies, and to
identify possible<br>
>>>> methods for addressing any incompatibilities.<br>
>>><br>
>>>> To date, these issues have been discussed on a
case by case<br>
>>>> basis. This cross-community workshop will
consider options for<br>
>>>> starting a process that could address them in a
more systemic<br>
>>>> manner.<br>
>>><br>
>>>> ________<br>
>>><br>
>>>> What would be the process to request the room? I
would be happy<br>
>>>> to send some emails, but given the experiences
during last ICANN <br>
>>>> meeting it might be more effective if someone
more senior in the <br>
>>>> ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Thanks in advance,<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Niels<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights <br>
>>>>> mailing <a href="mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org" target="_blank">listcc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org" target="_blank"><mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org></a> <br>
>>>>>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
</blockquote>
</div></div><span><span style="white-space:pre-wrap">>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>> cc-humanrights mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org" target="_blank">cc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
><br>
> ***********************************************<br>
> William J. Drake<br>
> International Fellow & Lecturer<br>
> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ<br>
> University of Zurich, Switzerland<br>
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, <br>
> ICANN, <a href="http://www.ncuc.org" target="_blank">www.ncuc.org</a><br>
> <a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a> (direct), <a href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com" target="_blank">wjdrake@gmail.com</a> (lists),<br>
> <a href="http://www.williamdrake.org" target="_blank">www.williamdrake.org</a><br>
> ***********************************************<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cc-humanrights mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org" target="_blank">cc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
></span><br>
<br></span><span><font color="#888888">
-- <br>
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD<br>
<a href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html" target="_blank">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a><br>
<br>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cc-humanrights mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org" target="_blank">cc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cc-humanrights mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org" target="_blank">cc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br></div></div><div><div dir="ltr"><div><b><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Marília Maciel</font></b></div><span class=""><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="#444444">Pesquisadora Gestora - </font><font color="#444444">Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - </font><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68)">FGV Direito Rio</span></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font color="#666666">Researcher and Coordinator - </font><font color="#666666">Center for Technology & Society - </font><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">FGV Law School</span></font></div><div><font color="#666666" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a><br></font></div><div><font color="#666666" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#666666" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">DiploFoundation associate - </font><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"><a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">www.diplomacy.edu</a></span></div></span><span class=""><div><font color="#666666" face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - </font><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:14px;font-size:small"><a href="http://www.politics.org.br/" target="_blank">http://www.politics.org.br/</a></span><br></div><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean"</span> - <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"><a href="http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en</a> </span></div><div><div><br></div></div></span></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>