<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>as Olivier reminded it, it is a cross-community working party. well yet another new specie of working setting within ICANN :) <br><br>my understanding since Singapore session is to have something ad-hoc for the time-being, starting quickly the work with volunteers from different parts of ICANN , having the goals highlighted in the charter and then moving to more formal setting when SOs/ACs are ready e.g. post CWG work . <br><br></div>however, we can inform the SOs/ACs about the charter, maybe also a tentative timeline, and keep them updated so they would be able to approve in due time and plan for the forthcoming workload.<br><br></div>Best,<br><br></div>Rafik<br><div><div><div><div><br><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2015-04-22 4:07 GMT+09:00 Patrik Fältström <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paf@netnod.se" target="_blank">paf@netnod.se</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks Olivier...I might got things upside down...too many things even for people like me :-P<br>
<br>
That said, I think this "by the drafting team accepted charter" explicitly should be sent to the SO/AC.<br>
<br>
For example, I have no idea whether SSAC officially would/will support this group, and/or how SSAC choose to interact with it.<br>
<br>
So at least I must get some time as chair of SSAC to deal with SSAC.<br>
<br>
That the group will now launch I think is clear (given you correcting me Olivier), we only do not know what formal support might might get.<br>
<br>
Do not pause or stop working just because of this! :-)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Patrik<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> On 21 apr 2015, at 13:26, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com">ocl@gih.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Dear Patrik,<br>
><br>
> this is a CCWP. I do not know whether there is a formal method of asking<br>
> the SO/ACs to ratify the charter of a CCWP, but I agree that it would<br>
> make sense if they did and would support asking them.<br>
> Kindest regards,<br>
><br>
> Olivier<br>
><br>
> On 21/04/2015 07:34, Patrik Fältström wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> On 21 apr 2015, at 01:18, Niels ten Oever <<a href="mailto:niels@article19.org">niels@article19.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> With pleasure I can announce that the charter has been adopted.<br>
>> Hmm...we individuals agree on the text but for a CCWG formal approval is needed. It must be passed to the SO and ACs that want to be chartering organizations for formal approval.<br>
>><br>
>> Is what you say you now will send it to the SOs and ACs for approval?<br>
>><br>
>> Patrik<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> cc-humanrights mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org">cc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD<br>
> <a href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html" target="_blank">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cc-humanrights mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org">cc-humanrights@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>