[ccPDP4-IDNWG] REMINDER: ccPDP4 IDN Working Group teleconference #6 | 1 December at 13:00 UTC

[Jaap Akkerhuis]

Apologies, I have a scheduling cpnflict. I 'll try to join (very) late at the call when possible,

The is a small refine ment I would like to suggest to the proposed
terminlogy of Territories in the background doc:
	
	For purposes of this policy “Territory” or “Territories”
	are defined as a country, a sub-division, or other area of
	particular geopolitical interest listed on the ‘International
	Standard ISO 3166, Codes for the representation of names
	of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1: Country Codes’,
	or, in some exceptional cases a country, a sub-division,
	or other area of particular geopolitical interest listed
	for an exceptionally reserved ISO 3166-1 code element.

Proposed text:

	For purposes of this policy “Territory” or “Territories”
	are defined as a country, a sub-division, or other area of
	particular geopolitical interest listed in Section 3 of the
	‘International Standard ISO 3166, Codes for the representation
	of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1:
	Country Codes’ [ISO 3166-1:2020] or, in some exceptional
	cases, e.g. grandfathered-in delegations, a country, a
	sub-division, or other area of particular geopolitical
	interest listed for an exceptionally reserved ISO 3166-1
	code element.

The reference bow identofy the version of the standard and the
remark about grandfathered-in is to clarify that this is an exception
made by ICANN to use the reserved code for a delegation (and it is
not referring to a ISO  3166/MA defined exceptional reserved code).

	jaap

PS. Quickly scanning the rest of doc I noticed some typos (such as
    Wole, sb. Whole).