[ccPDP4-IDNWG] Open issue 2: Sticking transitional arrangement under 7.9

Wed Feb 14 07:58:57 UTC 2024

Dear Bart, all!

I agree with striking 7.9 but suggest minor edits in 14.2.2 (see 2 options below, suggested changes marked by yellow)

Option 1

14.2.2   If at the time the IDNccTLD request process based on ccPDP4 becomes available, there is an IDNccTLD string requests that was submitted under the Fast Track Process and is still under consideration in the Fast Track Process, then it the validation of such request  must be completed through the Fast Track Process. 

Option 2

14.2.2   If at the time the IDNccTLD request process based on ccPDP4 becomes available, an IDNccTLD string requests that was submitted under the Fast Track Process and is in is still being processed under the Fast Track Process, then  it the validation of such request  must be completed through the Fast Track Process. 

Do I understand correctly that FIP is abbreviation for Final Implementation Plan? I so, another minor correction:

Completion results either in publication of the selected IDNccTLD string in accordance with section 5.6.4 of the Final Implementation Plan (FIP), or results in the withdrawal of the request by the requestor or in termination of the request by ICANN in accordance with section 5.4 of the FIP Final Implementation Plan[1].

Best,

Irina

From: ccPDP4-IDNWG <ccpdp4-idnwg-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel via ccPDP4-IDNWG
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 7:34 PM
To: ccpdp4-idnwg at icann.org
Subject: [ccPDP4-IDNWG] Open issue 2: Sticking transitional arrangement under 7.9

Dear all,

Per call today we have to open issues:

1.	Definition of Variants
2.	Whether section 7.9 is covered by section 14.2.

You are requested to provide your views on the definition and suggest changes. Preferably by Friday 16 February to allow us to include suggestion in the text

Is 7.9 covered by 14.2.2, and if not how should that section be changed?

Per call today the suggestion is to strike section 7.9, which reads:

If an IDNccTLD string request that was submitted under the Fast Track Process, is still in the Fast Track Technical and Similarity Validation process, the request will be validated under the Fast Track Process, including but not limited to the Fast Track Technical and Similarity review process.  

14.2.2   If at the time the IDNccTLD request process based on ccPDP4 becomes available, an IDNccTLD string requests that was submitted under the Fast Track Process and is still in the Fast Track Process, then it  must be completed through the Fast Track Process. Completion results either in publication of the selected IDNccTLD string in accordance with section 5.6.4 of the FIP, or results in the withdrawal of the request by the requestor or in termination of the request by ICANN in accordance with section 5.4 of the Final Implementation Plan[1]. 

If you believe the text is covered let us know, if not please suggest changes to section 14.2.2.  Goal is to include all transitional arrangement in section 14.2,

Kind regards,

Bart

  _____  

  _____  

[1] https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-cctld-implementation-plan-28mar19-en.pdf . From the FIP: “Several of the steps in the Request Submission for String Evaluation (Stage 2) allow for a requester to withdraw a request. It is also possible that ICANN will terminate a request if the request contains certain errors. “In addition, several circumstances are listed in the FIP, which trigger a termination by ICANN, for example, according to Section 5.6.3 “If the requester has not notified ICANN within three (3) calendar months after the date of notification by ICANN of DNS Stability Panel findings, the Termination Process will be initiated. See section 5.4 “

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccpdp4-idnwg/attachments/20240214/36d63f74/attachment-0001.html>